
Santos agreed to pay $35,000 to settle CFTC charges he manipulated a Kalshi contract tied to his State of the Union attendance. The agency said he generated $17,500 in profits.
Former U.S. Rep. George Santos agreed to pay $35,000 to settle Commodity Futures Trading Commission allegations that he manipulated a Kalshi prediction-market contract tied to attendance at the February 2026 State of the Union address.
The CFTC said Santos traded contracts based on whether he would attend the event while making public statements capable of moving their price. He generated more than $17,500 in profits from the activity, the agency said.
Two weeks before the address, Santos began posting publicly about whether he planned to attend. The CFTC said those statements caused the contract's “yes” and “no” prices to move sharply, allowing him to trade around information and decisions that he controlled. In one example, Santos held a “yes” position when he posted on X asking what he should wear to the State of the Union. The price rose within hours, after which he closed the trade at a profit. He later posted updates about traveling to Washington by plane and train while trading both sides of the contract.
“Santos acted willfully or, at the very least, recklessly,” the CFTC said. The agency accused him of making misleading statements and omissions to influence the market for his own financial benefit. Santos neither admitted nor denied the CFTC's findings. Under the settlement, he must return the profits earned from the trades and pay the remaining financial penalty. He also accepted a three-year ban from trading products overseen by the CFTC. The restrictions extend beyond prediction markets to futures and other regulated derivatives under the agency's jurisdiction.
The CFTC said the case differed from conventional market manipulation involving false rumors about a company or an economic event. Santos was trading on a personal action that he could directly influence, giving him control over information that other contract participants had to assess through his public statements. The arrangement created a conflict between his role as the subject of the contract and his role as a trader.
Santos' counsel, Josephy W. Murray, said the State of the Union contract was the first prediction-market bet Santos had ever placed and denied that he intended to deceive traders or manipulate the market. Murray said Santos initially expected to attend the address and booked hotel and airline reservations for Washington. His travel plans were then disrupted by winter weather affecting the East Coast, leading him to conclude that he could not attend safely and to take a “no” position.
“Mr. Santos concealed neither his intention to attend nor his change of plans to not attend the SOTU, from anyone,” Murray said. “There was absolutely no intent to deceive any person, nor intent to manipulate any market.” The defense presents the trades as a response to changing travel circumstances rather than a coordinated effort to move prices. The CFTC took a different view, arguing that Santos knowingly used public communications and withheld information about his trading activity while benefiting from the resulting market moves.
The CFTC has pursued several actions against prediction markets since 2023. The agency argued that many event contracts constitute illegal gaming under federal law and sought to block platforms from offering them. The CFTC recently told several platforms to stop filing contracts in bulk and proposed rules to restrict political betting.
Santos represented New York in Congress from January through December 2023. The House expelled him after an Ethics Committee investigation into misconduct and ethics violations.
Prepared with AlphaScala editorial tooling from the source reporting linked above. Indexable analysis may include a cited Alpha Score value. Publishing checks screen each story before release. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.