
EAC-PM study of 1.6 lakh bank accounts shows cash transfers raise household savings. Delhi's new ₹2,500 women's scheme raises the design question.
Delhi began paying ₹2,500 a month to eligible women on Aug. 1, adding one more state to a national patchwork of cash transfer schemes that reaches roughly 120 million women. The Delhi Lakshmi Yojana, also called Mahila Samriddhi Yojana, joined programmes in more than 15 states that together cost about ₹2.68 lakh crore, according to Project DEEP, a research group focused on direct cash transfers.
The expansion has revived a familiar policy fight: are unconditional transfers an effective welfare tool, or are they political freebies? A working paper from the Economic Advisory Council to the Prime Minister (EAC-PM) offers a data-heavy answer. The study tracked month-end balances in more than 1.6 lakh State Bank of India accounts linked to two schemes, Maharashtra's Ladki Bahin Yojana and Odisha's Subhadra Yojana.
The paper found that the effects of the transfers reach beyond the women who receive them. In Maharashtra, male relatives of beneficiaries saw their month-end bank balances rise 23 per cent and their spending fall 49 per cent. Pankhuri Shah of Project DEEP said the pattern reflects a shift inside households. When women have a steady, independent income, other family members face less pressure to cover everyday expenses, she said. Relatives saved more and spent less because of that shift, she said.
Beneficiaries themselves also saved more. The study found month-end balances rose about 84 per cent in Maharashtra and 45 per cent in Odisha, or absolute gains of roughly ₹6,884 and ₹6,887 per beneficiary. The paper described the similarity of those numbers as cross-programme validation of the savings impact and concluded that both schemes generate "large, statistically significant, and broadly consistent improvements in beneficiaries' savings and consumption."
Akshay Modi of Sattva Consulting, a non-profit working with communities and governments, cited evidence from more than 100 studies on unconditional cash transfers. Recipients report better food security, higher income, increased savings and better psychological well-being, Modi said. They are more likely to pay off debts and remain employed, and their children are more likely to stay in school.
Shah said cash is not a substitute for everything the state does. "It is an important component of the welfare portfolio, not the only one," she said. The choice between cash and services depends on the objective, she said. Subsidies can distort markets. Investment-oriented transfers such as PM-KISAN give beneficiaries freedom over how to spend. Where the quality of government services is hard to monitor at scale, cash can give citizens more agency, she said.
The current wave of monthly women's transfers grew out of earlier maternity benefits and incentives for girls and took off after 2020, when Direct Benefit Transfer made payments easier. The trend reached a new scale around the 2023-24 election cycle. Maharashtra's Ladki Bahin, announced after the Mahayuti alliance's setbacks in the 2024 general election, became the defining issue of the state election five months later. After the alliance won a larger-than-expected majority, its leaders credited the scheme. A Lokniti-CSDS post-election survey found that among Ladki Bahin beneficiaries, 54 per cent voted for Mahayuti, compared with half of all women surveyed.
Parties recognise that a recurring payment credited directly to a woman's account is highly visible and personally attributable, according to political analysts. The schemes are not necessarily "freebies," experts said. Shah said the Reserve Bank of India distinguishes between merit goods and other state expenditure, and the Supreme Court has drawn a similar line. On cash transfers, she said, global and Indian evidence shows they help households build productive assets and resilience. Modi said concerns about beneficiaries misusing cash are not supported by the evidence; studies show recipients are not more likely to spend on alcohol or cigarettes.
The EAC-PM paper recommends sustaining both programmes and moving toward "cash-plus" models that combine transfers with voluntary capacity-building and digital literacy. It also calls for stronger beneficiary targeting through hybrid verification, and for periodic review of transfer amounts against inflation and changing household spending. Efficiency gains from better targeting should fund enhanced benefits and complementary services, the paper said.
Drafted by a large language model from the source reporting linked above, then screened by automated publishing checks. It is not read by a journalist before publication. Some articles cite our Alpha Score. Verify prices and figures against the original source. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.