
Austria's FMA fined Bitpanda €70K for MiCA violations, the first public penalty under the new EU crypto framework. The exchange missed a whitepaper deadline.
Austria's Financial Market Authority fined Bitpanda €70,000 for violating the European Union's Markets in Crypto-Assets regulation. The FMA said the Vienna-based exchange failed to submit a crypto-asset whitepaper at least 20 working days before its publication. That deadline is part of MiCA's procedural rules for communications tied to crypto-assets.
The regulator also flagged problems in Bitpanda's marketing. In one instance, the company sent promotional material before the corresponding whitepaper had been filed. MiCA prohibits that sequence to ensure investors receive core information before any marketing begins. In another message, Bitpanda omitted mandatory legal notes: a statement that the whitepaper had not been reviewed or approved by a regulatory authority, and a reminder that the issuer remains responsible for its content. The same communication lacked a required phone number and email address.
The FMA processed the case under an expedited procedure available under Austrian financial market law. The decision is now legally final, the regulator said. The fine does not involve fraud or investor losses, a distinction the FMA pointed out in its announcement.
The sanction comes roughly six months after MiCA's full entry into force for crypto service providers at the end of 2024. Bitpanda holds a MiCA license and continues to operate across Europe. The case shows that licensing does not exempt a firm from meeting all transparency obligations. The rules cover documents, deadlines, and the content of messages sent to the public.
The European Commission has scheduled a review of MiCA for 2027, which could tighten rules around foreign stablecoin issuers. For now, the Bitpanda fine provides the first concrete example of how national regulators are applying the framework's procedural requirements – and what happens when a platform misses a deadline.
Drafted by a large language model from the source reporting linked above, then screened by automated publishing checks. It is not read by a journalist before publication. Some articles cite our Alpha Score. Verify prices and figures against the original source. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.