
The BIS Annual Economic Report warns dollar-pegged stablecoins like USDT and USDC amplify dollar dominance and pose risks to emerging markets. Report models "modestly negative" output effects at $1-3T issuance.
The Bank for International Settlements, in its Annual Economic Report released June 23, warned that dollar-pegged stablecoins like Tether's USDT and Circle's USDC are accelerating what it calls "stablecoin dollarization." When financial stress hits emerging markets, people rush into these tokens as a fast lane to US dollar exposure. The result is not a new monetary paradigm. It is the old one, turbocharged.
Over 99% of the roughly $320 billion stablecoin market, as of end-May 2026, is tied to the US dollar. USDT and USDC dominate that figure. An earlier BIS research paper from May 5 pegged dollar dominance in stablecoin value at approximately 98%.
The BIS report does not frame this as a neutral observation. It frames it as a structural risk, particularly for emerging market and developing economies. When residents of those countries swap local currency for dollar-denominated stablecoins in seconds, it creates what amounts to a digital bank run on their own monetary systems during moments of stress.
The report also argued stablecoins fail what it considers core monetary properties: singleness (one dollar should always equal one dollar, regardless of issuer), elasticity (the money supply should expand and contract with economic needs), interoperability (different forms of money should work together), and integrity (resistance to fraud and illicit use). The BIS comparison was pointed. It likened stablecoins more to shares in an exchange-traded fund than to actual money.
The US Genius Act, passed in 2025, actively encourages the growth of dollar-pegged stablecoins as a tool to extend USD dominance globally. So the US government promotes what the BIS warns about.
The BIS report modeled what happens if stablecoins scale significantly beyond their current size. Even at $1 to $3 trillion in total issuance, the net output effects from stablecoin activity may be "modestly negative," according to the analysis. Part of the mechanism involves bank funding costs. Deposits flow out of traditional banking systems into stablecoin issuers, who park reserves in US Treasuries and money market instruments. Banks then may need to offer higher rates to compete for deposits. That raises lending costs, tightens credit, and slows economic activity.
For emerging market assets, the dollarization concern is real and measurable. Countries like Turkey and Argentina have already seen significant stablecoin adoption as citizens seek dollar exposure outside formal banking channels.
For the broader crypto market, the BIS framing of stablecoins as "not real money" could influence how regulators treat them in banking and payments contexts. If stablecoins are legally categorized more like ETF shares than like deposits or cash equivalents, that changes the capital requirements and consumer protection rules that apply to them.
The BIS said stablecoins are more like ETF shares than money. The report runs 155 pages and covers tokenized deposits and central bank digital currencies alongside stablecoins. The full document is available on the BIS website.
Prepared with AlphaScala research tooling and grounded in primary market data: live prices, fundamentals, SEC filings, hedge-fund holdings, and insider activity. Each story is checked against AlphaScala publishing rules before release. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.