
Anthropic gives another $20M to Public First Action, bringing total to $40M. The donation fuels AI regulation debate ahead of midterm elections and could reignite tensions with the White House.
Anthropic donated an additional $20 million to Public First Action, a group that pushes for stricter artificial intelligence rules. The contribution brings the startup's total spending on the organization to $40 million.
Anthropic announced the donation Tuesday, as lawmakers debate AI regulation ahead of November's midterm elections.
"We've long argued that frontier AI companies should be transparent about what their models can do and how they're managing the risks," Anthropic said. The company noted it has supported recently passed state laws requiring greater transparency for AI developers. Transparency alone is insufficient, Anthropic said, given how fast the most powerful models are advancing.
Public First Action describes itself as a bipartisan group focused on educating the public about AI. It campaigns for safety standards, transparency, accountability measures and whistleblower protections.
Anthropic said both donations were made "exclusively to support Public First Action's public education and policy mission, and cannot be used to influence the election of any candidate for federal, state, or local office."
The Wall Street Journal reported Wednesday that Public First has positioned itself as a counterweight to Leading The Future, a group with industry-friendly AI policies similar to those favored by the White House. The Journal said the new donation could reopen tensions between Anthropic and the Biden administration. The government briefly blocked two of Anthropic's models over security concerns and called the startup a security risk. Anthropic later sued.
Critics argue Anthropic wants regulation to limit competition, the Journal added. They say CEO Dario Amodei is hypocritical for warning about AI dangers while continuing to improve the company's models. Amodei and Anthropic say their concern for model safety is genuine.
Separately, state attorneys general are policing AI using existing consumer protection, privacy and professional licensing laws, PYMNTS reported this week. The report advised businesses that AI compliance cannot wait for Congress or state legislatures to set up new frameworks. Companies should check whether AI systems follow existing rules on privacy, discrimination, advertising, consumer protection, professional services and consequential decision-making.
Drafted by a large language model from the source reporting linked above, then screened by automated publishing checks. It is not read by a journalist before publication. Some articles cite our Alpha Score. Verify prices and figures against the original source. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.