Stocks● Neutral

8.95% FD Rate Flags NBFC Credit Risk Exposure

By AlphaScala Research DeskSource reporting: livemint.comEditorial standards2 views
8.95% FD Rate Flags NBFC Credit Risk Exposure

Muthoot Capital's 8.95% three-year FD tops the rate table, but issuer-specific credit and liquidity risks demand rating scrutiny for investors.

Company fixed deposits from Muthoot Capital Services offer 8.95% for a three-year deposit, the highest among a batch of rates compiled by Paisabazaar. The same firm pays 7.90% for one-year and 8.50% for five-year deposits.

Investors chasing the headline number take on credit risk that is issuer-specific. Company FDs are not covered by deposit insurance the way bank deposits are. A default at the borrower level, say, a liquidity squeeze at a non-bank lender, can leave principal and accrued interest in doubt.

Manipal Housing Finance Syndicate offers 8.00% across one-, two- and three-year maturities. Bajaj Finance pays 7.75% for tenures from 31 to 60 months. Shriram Finance and Can Fin Homes each offer 7.50% for three- to five-year deposits and a 36-month tenure, respectively.

The extra yield over a bank fixed deposit reflects the credit spread these non-bank lenders must offer to attract retail money. That spread varies with the issuer's rating, capital position, and asset quality. Paisabazaar's data does not break out ratings for each scheme, but the rate itself points to the risk the market prices in.

Senior citizen investors get an additional 0.25 to 0.50 percentage point on the regular rate. Shriram Finance adds 0.50% for seniors, plus 0.05% for women investors and 0.15% on renewals of matured deposits. At PNB Housing Finance, the senior-citizen benefit applies only to deposits up to ₹1 crore.

The risk event here is not a sudden crisis but the accumulated exposure in a rising-rate environment. Company FDs carry no guarantee beyond the issuer's own balance sheet. A downgrade or a regulatory clampdown on a specific NBFC could freeze withdrawals or trigger losses, as seen in previous episodes of non-bank stress. Investors who lock in these rates for three to five years are betting the issuer stays solvent and liquid for the full term.

What would reduce that risk: a credit rating of AA or above, a diversified portfolio of deposits across multiple issuers, and a preference for shorter tenures that allow reinvestment at the market's prevailing rate. What would worsen it: a downgrade of the issuer, a sector-wide liquidity dry-up, or a concentration of deposits in a single name.

A rate of 8.95% buys three years of extra income. It also buys exposure that needs watching.

How this story was producedLast reviewed Oct 11, 2026

Drafted by a large language model from the source reporting linked above, then screened by automated publishing checks. It is not read by a journalist before publication. Some articles cite our Alpha Score. Verify prices and figures against the original source. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.

Editorial Policy·Report a correction·Risk Disclaimer