
A Fireblocks survey of 638 C-suite executives reveals 89% commit budget to digital asset infrastructure in 2026, while only 16% have reached production. Spending is real; execution lags.
Fireblocks, in a new report titled “Financial Grid: Banking, Digital Assets, And The Infrastructure Decisions Defining 2026,” said it surveyed 638 C-suite executives and decision-makers at financial institutions and corporations across North America, Europe, Latin America, APAC, and the Middle East and Africa. The research was conducted by The Value Exchange in January.
Money is flowing. The pipeline has barely started delivering.
Roughly 88% to 89% of institutions have either committed or plan to commit budget to digital asset infrastructure this year, the survey found. Only 11% are pushing their spend to 2027.
Production deployments tell a different story. Just 16% of those institutions operate live services. The rest remain in planning and proof-of-concept stages.
The spending itself is substantial. Some 53% of institutions are allocating $1 million or more in 2026 specifically to production-scale digital asset initiatives, according to Fireblocks. C-suite executives directly lead blockchain and digital asset efforts at 55% of the institutions surveyed. Financial infrastructure transformation was the top driver for half the respondents.
Where do institutions see the competitive pressure? Not from other banks. Some 43% of respondents identified fintech companies and payment service providers as the primary threat driving their blockchain and digital asset strategies.
Payment solutions and tokenized securities rank among the top use cases institutions are prioritizing. On the asset side, the focus is on stablecoins and tokenized deposits, the survey found. Tokenized securities have seen growing volumes, with platforms like Bybit adding Meta and Tesla stocks as the market reached $1.48B in notional value, according to a recent report.
Regulation is viewed as a tailwind by 96% of respondents, the survey found. The expectation is that upcoming frameworks, including MiCA in Europe and evolving US guidance, will be favorable or very favorable for digital asset adoption.
MiCA, which took full effect in the European Union, establishes rules for crypto-asset markets and stablecoin issuance. It also sets licensing requirements for service providers. In the US, the regulatory picture has shifted under more crypto-receptive political conditions, with clearer guidelines emerging for bank custody, trading, and digital asset offerings.
The report suggests the primary challenge is not willingness to invest but execution capacity. Many institutions are still determining how to integrate digital asset services into existing compliance and technology stacks, a pattern reflected in the wide gap between budget and live products.
Drafted by a large language model from the source reporting linked above, then screened by automated publishing checks. It is not read by a journalist before publication. Some articles cite our Alpha Score. Verify prices and figures against the original source. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.