
Sen. Ron Wyden urged Senate leaders to keep the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act in the Clarity Act, facing opposition from law enforcement and anti-trafficking groups.
Sen. Ron Wyden this week urged Senate leaders to keep a contested provision in the Clarity Act that would exempt non-custodial crypto developers from money transmitter rules. The Oregon Democrat sent a letter to Majority Leader John Thune and Democratic Leader Charles Schumer arguing that the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act, or BRCA, should stay in the package.
The BRCA started as a standalone bill from Sen. Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo. Wyden is its only cosponsor. The measure says developers who do not hold or control customer funds should not count as money transmitters, a classification that triggers licensing and compliance requirements. It was later folded into the Clarity Act, the broader crypto market structure bill, and has become one of the biggest unresolved pieces of the legislation.
“Smart policy will empower law enforcement to do its job and facilitate innovation at the same time,” Wyden wrote in the letter, which was seen by The Block. “As the Senate continues its consideration of the Clarity Act, I urge you to include the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act in any legislative package.”
Not everyone agrees. Two separate coalitions sent letters in June raising concerns about the developer safe harbor. The first came from groups representing more than 70,000 prosecutors, sheriffs, and police officers, including the National District Attorneys Association and the International Association of Chiefs of Police. It went to Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche and White House crypto adviser Patrick Witt. The letter warned that broad exemptions could shield people who help move illicit money.
“Regulatory certainty should not come at the expense of accountability, transparency, victim protection, or public safety,” the law enforcement groups wrote. They added that other parts of the Clarity Act could weaken anti-money-laundering safeguards.
The second letter came from the Alliance to End Human Trafficking, a network of Catholic sisters and advocates. It went directly to Thune and Schumer. The alliance tied Section 604 to trafficking and money-laundering risks.
“We are particularly concerned that certain provisions under Section 604 could create broad carveouts and regulatory ambiguities that may make it more difficult to responsibly monitor illicit financial activity tied to trafficking, organized crime, child exploitation, sanctions evasion, and other forms of abuse,” the group wrote.
Wyden pushed back in his letter. He said the BRCA would align Department of Justice and FinCEN policy, focusing enforcement on unlicensed money transmitting businesses rather than ordinary coders. The provision includes an exception for any non-custodial developer found to be transferring or using funds from illicit activity. Those bad actors would lose protection.
The crypto industry largely backs the safe harbor. More than 120 crypto groups have publicly supported it, arguing it prevents innovation from moving overseas and gives developers legal clarity to build without fear of state-by-state licensing.
The fight over BRCA is now a make-or-break issue for the Clarity Act. Lawmakers are also stuck on whether new ethics rules are needed for officials with crypto ties, including President Donald Trump. Time is running short. Congress leaves Washington in August, and the November election cycle is closing in.
If the BRCA stays in the bill, the Clarity Act probably keeps industry support. If it gets stripped or substantially rewritten, the crypto groups could withdraw backing, making passage harder. Law enforcement wants tighter language; developers want the safe harbor intact. There is no obvious middle ground yet.
The next concrete marker will come when the Senate returns from recess or releases a revised draft. The letter from Wyden signals that the provision has at least one powerful ally on the Democratic side. The question is whether that is enough to overcome the opposition from prosecutors and anti-trafficking advocates.
Prepared with AlphaScala research tooling and grounded in primary market data: live prices, fundamentals, SEC filings, hedge-fund holdings, and insider activity. Each story is checked against AlphaScala publishing rules before release. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.