
The West Bengal government wants to revive the Calcutta Stock Exchange. Critics say it is pointless. CSE last traded in 2013 and would need heavy investment. History shows small regional exchanges cannot compete with NSE and BSE.
The West Bengal government wants to bring the Calcutta Stock Exchange back to life. The effort has drawn sharp criticism from market observers who say regional exchanges lost their purpose two decades ago when NSE and BSE rolled out satellite-linked trading terminals. Location stopped mattering. Turnover vanished from CSE and other regional exchanges soon after.
SEBI started showing regional exchanges the exit door in 2013. The regulator allowed voluntary exits for any exchange without trading on its platform or with annual turnover below ₹1,000 crore and net worth under ₹100 crore. Eighteen regional exchanges, including the Madras, Delhi, Ahmedabad and Bangalore stock exchanges, exited between 2013 and 2019. CSE survived only on paper. It has not recorded a single trade since 2013 because it failed to set up a clearing corporation.
The first problem with reviving CSE is cost. The exchange would need to spend heavily on a trading platform, a clearing corporation, a depository, surveillance systems and other technology. It does not appear able to meet SEBI's current turnover and net worth thresholds, the editorial argues. That cash has to come from somewhere, and CSE has no trading revenue.
The second problem is the assumption that a revived CSE would boost fundraising and employment in the region. Experience with Metropolitan Stock Exchange in Mumbai shows that companies and investors gravitate to the largest exchange with the best price discovery and most liquidity. A small regional exchange cannot compete with NSE and BSE on either metric.
The third problem is turning CSE into another SME exchange. Small company stocks are prone to manipulation. During the Ketan Parekh scam in 2001, CSE-listed stocks were heavily rigged, triggering a payment crisis. Both BSE and NSE already run SME platforms. Adding a third one, especially one with a history of weak governance, would serve no clear purpose.
The last objection is systemic. Allowing CSE to reopen would reverse the 2013 reforms that consolidated trading among a few large, well-governed exchanges. Other regional exchanges would likely demand the same treatment, forcing SEBI to police a dozen tiny venues again. Regulators have shown no appetite for that.
Investor exposure today is near zero because CSE has no trading. The risk would emerge only if the revival succeeds and companies list exclusively on CSE. Those securities could face wide bid-ask spreads, thin liquidity, and settlement delays. The Ketan Parekh precedent shows price rigging in SME stocks is not a theoretical threat.
What would confirm the sceptical view? SEBI rejecting the revival plan outright or the West Bengal government dropping the effort. What would weaken the view? A special exemption that lets CSE reopen with far lower capital and infrastructure standards than its peers. The more likely path is regulatory deadlock. Eighteen regional exchanges already accepted exits between 2013 and 2019. Their shareholders took the package and moved on.
Prepared with AlphaScala research tooling and grounded in primary market data: live prices, fundamentals, SEC filings, hedge-fund holdings, and insider activity. Each story is checked against AlphaScala publishing rules before release. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.