
Crypto holders expected a 22% annual return versus 7% for non-holders, a Cleveland Fed paper finds. Expected returns and perceived risk explain twice as much ownership as demographics.
A working paper from the Cleveland Federal Reserve upends the usual demographic story about crypto ownership. What matters most, the researchers found, is not how old you are or how much you earn. It's what you think the return will be over the next twelve months.
The paper, titled "Do You Even Crypto, Bro? Cryptocurrencies in Household Finance," uses quarterly surveys of 15,000 to 25,000 U.S. households from 2018 through early 2025. The authors – economists Michael Weber, Bernardo Candia, Olivier Coibion and Yuriy Gorodnichenko – compared crypto holders with owners of stocks and gold.
In 2021, 87% of households that did not own crypto said they did not know what return to expect over twelve months. Among holders, that share was 54%. Those who made a forecast expected a 22% annual return. Non-holders expected 7%. That gap was the widest across all assets studied.
Each additional percentage point of expected return lifted the probability of holding crypto by 0.8 points, the researchers said. Expected returns and perceived risk together explained roughly twice as much variation in ownership as all observable characteristics – age, income, education, gender.
Demographics still play a role. Households under 40 hold crypto 13 points more often than those over 60. Men hold it 4 points more than women, all else equal. The belief channel had a larger effect, the authors found.
The paper includes a randomized controlled experiment run in the second quarter of 2025. Some households saw bitcoin's return over the prior twelve months, which was 14.3%. Others saw the return for stocks or inflation. Households that got the bitcoin figure raised their desired crypto allocation by about 2 percentage points – a 47% increase from the 4.3% target in the control group. Actual purchases rose by 2.5 points, a statistically significant result.
The effect was concentrated among households that said they lacked information. Those who already considered crypto a bad investment did not change their allocation.
The paper also tracks how households spend crypto gains. A doubling of bitcoin price made a household fully invested in crypto 1.4 points more likely to buy a durable good – roughly a 7% increase relative to the average probability of such a purchase. The effect did not extend to current spending, unlike stock or bond gains. The authors called crypto gains "more like lottery winnings" than permanent enrichment.
The study has limits. Expectation data is mostly from 2021. The sample is a voluntary consumer panel. The experiment covers only one quarter. Still, the researchers concluded that lack of information and common beliefs "suggest that price volatility will continue to be one of the most defining features of this new asset in the foreseeable future."
Prepared with AlphaScala editorial tooling from the source reporting linked above. Indexable analysis may include a cited Alpha Score value. Publishing checks screen each story before release. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.