
The 10% US tariff on Indian gems and jewellery under Section 301 creates a duty disadvantage against EU and Africa, which enjoy duty-free access, GJEPC said. An India-US BTA is the key catalyst.
The United States' 10% additional tariff on Indian gems and jewellery under its new Section 301 forced-labour regime took effect July 24, replacing the temporary Section 122 tariffs. The Gem and Jewellery Export Promotion Council (GJEPC) said the measure creates a competitive gap for Indian exporters against key diamond trading hubs in the European Union and Africa, which continue to enjoy duty-free access for natural diamonds.
“European Union (Belgium), a global diamond trading hub, continues to enjoy a zero per cent additional tariff on natural diamonds, while comparable Indian-origin diamonds attract a 10 per cent duty, creating a significant competitive gap for Indian exporters,” GJEPC said in a press statement. The council noted that several major diamond-producing countries, including Botswana, Namibia, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Zimbabwe, Sierra Leone, Liberia, Ghana, Tanzania and Mauritius, remain outside the scope of the current Section 301 action.
India still holds a tariff advantage over countries such as China, Hong Kong, Thailand, Türkiye, the UAE, Israel and Vietnam, which face a higher additional tariff of 12.5%. The effective import duty on jewellery exports from India now stands at approximately 15.5%–16%, combining the existing US MFN duty of 5.5%–6% with the new 10% Section 301 tariff. Lab-grown diamonds and synthetic stones are also subject to the 10% additional tariff.
GJEPC Chairman Kirit Bhansali said the 10% tariff is not justified and remains a challenge for India's gem and jewellery exports, particularly as competing diamond trading centres enjoy duty-free access. India's placement in the lower tariff band provides some relative competitiveness for jewellery exports, he added. Bhansali said bridging the remaining tariff gap through an early India-US Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) and securing tariff relief for natural diamonds and coloured gemstones remain key priorities.
The council rejected any suggestion that India's gem and jewellery sector is linked to forced labour and welcomed the government's recent amendment to the Foreign Trade Policy prohibiting imports of goods produced wholly or partly with forced labour. “The council is actively engaging with the government to pursue an early India–US Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) to bridge the tariff gap and enhance the competitiveness of India’s gem and jewellery exports in the US market,” the statement said.
Prepared with AlphaScala editorial tooling from the source reporting linked above. Indexable analysis may include a cited Alpha Score value. Publishing checks screen each story before release. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.