
Tiger Research warns that scattered liquidity and revenue fragmentation could cap growth of tokenized equities, with several projects already shuttered.
A research note from Tiger Research flags liquidity fragmentation as a structural threat to the tokenized stock market, a space still searching for scale. Director Ryan Yoon described the breakup of previously consolidated, centralized liquidity in traditional finance as a “serious structural threat” to the emerging asset class.
Tokenized stocks – digital representations of traditional equities on blockchain networks – rely on deep, unified liquidity to function efficiently. When order flow is scattered across multiple platforms, protocols, or jurisdictions, execution costs rise. Spreads widen. Settlement delays creep in. The core value proposition of 24/7 trading, instant settlement, and global access erodes.
Centralized liquidity built over decades in TradFi is hard to replicate on-chain. Tokenized stocks currently trade on a patchwork of decentralized and semi-decentralized networks. That structural mismatch creates shallow pools rather than a single deep market. Yoon’s analysis points to this tension as the root cause of the liquidity problem.
The report identifies revenue fragmentation as a second-order consequence. When trading volume scatters across fragmented liquidity, platforms struggle to generate sustainable fee income. Market makers pull back, volume drops further, and the economics tighten. Platforms then face a choice: raise fees on a shrinking user base or accept thinner margins.
This dynamic is already visible. Several tokenized stock platforms have scaled back or shut down entirely. The pattern echoes the three crypto infrastructure projects that shut down on May 21. Without a clear revenue model tied to consolidated liquidity, projects dependent on thin order books often fail.
A unified liquidity aggregation layer could solve the fragmentation problem. If multiple platforms route orders through a shared order book or a common liquidity pool, spreads tighten and volume consolidates. Some protocols are experimenting with cross-chain liquidity bridges, though adoption remains early. The success of these bridges will determine whether the market can scale.
Regulatory clarity would also help. The EU MiCA Review Targets Stablecoin Interest Ban, DeFi Rules shows that regulators are beginning to address the infrastructure behind tokenized assets. A clear legal framework for tokenized stocks could encourage institutional participation. Institutions bring the deep liquidity that fragmented retail flows cannot provide.
A regulatory crackdown on tokenized stock issuers would accelerate fragmentation. If jurisdictions impose conflicting rules, platforms will isolate their liquidity pools by geography. That outcome would make the problem harder to address, not easier.
A market downturn that reduces trading volume across all tokenized assets would amplify the impact of fragmentation. Lower volume already leaves liquidity thin. A sharp sentiment shift like the Bitcoin Pulls Back From $80K as Peace Draft Shifts Sentiment would test the resilience of fragmented liquidity even further.
The next catalyst to watch is adoption of cross-chain liquidity protocols. If they gain traction and regulators provide a consistent framework, the structural threat Yoon identified may recede. If not, the tokenized stock market will remain shallow and vulnerable to the revenue pressures that have already forced several projects offline.
Prepared with AlphaScala editorial tooling from the source reporting linked above. Indexable analysis may include a cited Alpha Score value. Publishing checks screen each story before release. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.