Tokenized RWAs crossed $30B. Broadridge moves $370B in repo a day. Apollo posts private credit on Aave. The industry knows what it has, and what it's missing.
Tokenized real-world assets have crossed $30 billion. That is roughly six times where they sat at the start of 2025. A survey by EY and Coinbase Institutional found 64% of asset managers now want to tokenize, up from 40% a year earlier. The argument about demand is over. The crypto and tokenization narratives have diverged. The broader crypto market is finding its footing. Bitcoin sat around $60,000 for most of the TokenizeThis 2026 conference, as tracked in our Bitcoin profile. Almost nobody on stage seemed to care.
Regulation is why the mood shifted from last year. The GENIUS Act gave payment stablecoins legitimacy. The CLARITY Act, still working through the Senate, is the bigger unlock. RedStone co-founder Marcin Kazmierczak framed it bluntly: CLARITY could be a 10x or even 100x moment relative to GENIUS, because it opens the door to the full range of asset classes.
The EY and Coinbase Institutional survey provided the statistical backbone for the conference. Beyond the headline 64% of asset managers wanting to tokenize, the survey found that 49% named the integration of blockchain into traditional portfolio and risk frameworks as their biggest readiness gap. This tracks with the compliance scramble Fidelity's Jasmine Jia described. The survey also showed that the shift is not just a US phenomenon. European and Asian asset managers are moving at a similar pace, driven by local regulatory clarity and demand for yield enhancement.
Collateral is where tokenization earns its keep first. The repo panel at TokenizeThis 2026 laid out the math. Broadridge's Robert Krugman said the firm now moves around $370 billion of tokenized repo a day on the Canton network. That is a sliver of the $12 trillion US repo market. A real sliver. The programmability pitch is simple. Ami Ben-David, CEO at Ownera, put it bluntly: "If you want to borrow for five minutes, you pay for five minutes instead of a full day. It's a no-brainer." This granularity is impossible in traditional repo markets, where trades are typically structured as overnight or term agreements. The ability to borrow and lend at the minute level unlocks efficiency for liquidity providers and reduces counterparty risk for borrowers.
Asset managers echoed utility over novelty. A recurring principle was that if you tokenize a product, it has to be a net better product than the one it replaces. Apollo's Christine Moy said the firm's tokenized private credit fund has confirmed what she calls the "superpowers" of onchain assets: secondary liquidity for otherwise illiquid products, and the ability to post private credit as collateral in DeFi protocols like Aave and Morpho. This is a direct improvement over the traditional model, where private credit sits idle in a fund structure.
Treasury desks are coming around for similar reasons. WisdomTree's Maredith Hannon described a small US construction company paying an Argentine vendor through a tokenized money market fund behind a familiar web interface. No second bank account. The treasurer earns yield while the money moves. Citi's Ryan Rugg described the bank's tokenized deposits and its 24/7 dollar clearing. Clients "don't want just a Citi token," he said. They want multi-bank rails. The demand for interoperability at the treasury level is a direct pushback against the walled-garden approach.
Plenty is still broken, and panelists said so. Distribution is the next frontier. Moy's point was that the next wave of investors started with bitcoin and a cartoon monkey, not a blue-chip stock. You meet them in their wallet. Maple has taken that literally, originating loans on-chain in stablecoins. The distribution challenge is not just about technology. It is about meeting a new class of investor where they already live.
Compliance is the other bottleneck. Fidelity's Jasmine Jia described a manager thrown into a scramble when a client received a token as an airdrop. A trivial sum that still tripped internal alarms and put compliance modernization on the agenda. The survey backed her up: 49% named the integration of blockchain into traditional portfolio and risk frameworks as their biggest readiness gap. The systems designed for quarterly statements and monthly NAVs are not built for 24/7 settlement and real-time holdings.
Fragmentation and lack of interoperability are the biggest long-term challenges. Stellar's Raja Chakravorti called interoperability the single greatest long-term unlock. Assets stuck on a single platform or blockchain cannot move freely. Hundreds of chains and competing notions of finality spread liquidity thinner and thinner. Ripple's Lauren Berta noted that finality varies across chains. A trade counted as settled can still reverse. This does not scale. No one on stage claimed to have solved it yet.
The Q&A session with Joshua de Vos, head of research at CoinDesk, dug into the data. Tokenized equity trading volumes hit a new all-time high in June at $3.86 billion, a 145% jump from May. The SpaceX IPO was the main catalyst, with tokenized SPCX generating $1.19 billion across platforms including Backpack and xStocks. Most activity runs through synthetic wrappers rather than issuer-sponsored structures. A large share is perpetual futures rather than spot, mirroring the broader crypto derivatives volume trend. The on-chain market cap of tokenized equities is $1.53 billion, a fraction of the $1.5 trillion in combined trading volume year-to-date. de Vos said the data shows strong demand for on-chain equity exposure. It does not yet show that demand being met through direct ownership, he added.
The central question is what the token actually represents. In the strongest model, the token is the share itself. Ownership and voting rights travel with it. In a synthetic wrapper, the investor owns a contractual claim against another entity, not the underlying share. Two tokens with the same ticker can represent very different instruments. The SEC's January 2026 staff statement drew this distinction explicitly, a topic covered in our analysis of transfer agents pushing for restrictions on unaffiliated tokenized stocks. For advisors evaluating these products, the structure is not a technical detail. It determines what rights the holder actually has. The difference between owning a share and owning a promise of a share is the difference between direct exposure and counterparty risk.
The regulatory framework is more developed than most people realize. Gaps remain. In the past eight months, the SEC issued a no-action letter for DTC tokenization services and approved Nasdaq's proposal to trade tokenized securities alongside conventional shares. DTCC completed its first live production transactions this month. Tokenized equities remain largely restricted to non-U.S. or accredited investors. The CLARITY Act has not been enacted. Third-party synthetic models carry more legal uncertainty than issuer-sponsored structures. The framework is building in a clear direction. Speed is the remaining variable. The infrastructure providers are ready. The asset managers are ready. The regulators are moving. The final mile of clear, comprehensive rules for direct tokenized ownership is still under construction.
The mood at the Glasshouse was not hype. It was an industry that knows what it has and knows what it's missing. Next year tells us whether we built the boring parts.
Drafted by a large language model from the source reporting linked above, then screened by automated publishing checks. It is not read by a journalist before publication. Some articles cite our Alpha Score. Verify prices and figures against the original source. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.