
Tillis and Gallego reportedly finished rewriting the Clarity Act's ethics section, but the text is unseen and the Senate has days before recess.
Two senators have reportedly finished a rewrite of the Clarity Act's conflict-of-interest section. Nobody outside the room has seen the text, and the Senate is nearly out of time.
Senators Thom Tillis, a Republican, and Ruben Gallego, a Democrat, completed their version of the ethics language, according to CoinDesk, citing sources familiar with the matter. The section would bar senior government officials from direct ties to cryptocurrency projects, a provision written with President Donald Trump's crypto business in mind. Trump agreed last week to ethics constraints that Democratic opponents faulted for leaving enforcement to a Justice Department run by his own appointees. The push for tougher language has intensified after a disclosure showed the Trump family cleared more than $1.4 billion from crypto in 2025.
Beyond the ethics fight, the Clarity Act faces resistance over illicit-finance provisions affecting DeFi developers and stablecoin rewards programs. The odds of passage have sunk to 27% after previous delays, per AlphaScala's tracking.
The clock is also ticking. Senate Majority Leader John Thune said in a Tuesday Fox News interview that the Senate will probably vote on the Clarity Act before the August recess, while cautioning that it depends on whether Democrats supply the votes. Cloture, the procedure that sets up a floor vote, requires multiple votes plus a 30-hour debate period. The Senate's final days before recess leave little room for that process.
Drafted by a large language model from the source reporting linked above, then screened by automated publishing checks. It is not read by a journalist before publication. Some articles cite our Alpha Score. Verify prices and figures against the original source. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.