
USMCA compliance hit 80% by July 2025 as tariffs rose, pulling trade under the pact. The cushion carried costs: tighter sourcing rules. The Supreme Court's Feb 2026 ruling changed the calculus ahead of the review.
The share of U.S. imports entering duty-free under the United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement hit roughly 80 percent by July 2025, up from about 50 percent for Mexican goods and below 40 percent for Canadian ones a year earlier. The jump came as a new wave of U.S. tariffs raised the cost of non-USMCA trade while preserving the exemption for qualifying goods, according to data from the U.S. International Trade Commission.
Compliance with the trade pact carries its own costs. Certification, documentation and rules-of-origin requirements add administrative burdens and limit sourcing flexibility. Exporters can choose to pay a fallback tariff rate instead, a route many Mexican and Canadian firms took before 2025 when those rates were still low.
Two earlier agreements – the U.S.–Canada Free Trade Agreement in 1989 and NAFTA in 1994 – eliminated most internal tariffs while conditioning access on regional input sourcing. That conditionality tightened under the USMCA, which replaced NAFTA in July 2020. Stricter origin rules and certification demands added to the compliance load.
Compliance rates had drifted lower in the late 2000s and again early in the pandemic. They stabilized at historic lows before accelerating sharply in early 2025, when the new tariffs raised the cost of non-USMCA trade while keeping the exemption for qualifying goods. The recent increase marked a structural shift in how Mexican and Canadian goods enter the U.S., Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas economists Enrique Martínez García and Ron Mau wrote in a report.
Entering under USMCA does not always mean duty-free. Most qualifying goods face zero duty, eligibility is assessed product by product at the tariff-line level. A single shipment can include goods that qualify and others that do not, because they fall short of origin rules or lack proper documentation.
Banco de México economists José Ramón Morán and Alfonso Cebreros have shown that stricter rules of origin shape sourcing decisions by tying access to regional content thresholds. Compliance burdens limit efficient sourcing. Higher non-preferential tariffs push firms toward compliance, promoting regionalization but increasing administrative and production costs, the Fed economists noted.
Tariff exposure is not evenly spread. Product-level exemptions have partly shielded AI-related goods, keeping effective rates there lower than for other products. In those sectors, trade is driven more by demand tied to the AI investment boom than by tariff avoidance, the report said.
A large share of imports that once may have entered duty-free outside the USMCA are now routed through its duty-free channels. Non-USMCA imports subject to duties, especially from Canada, have fallen, pointing to a narrowing of trade outside the preferential regime.
Mexico data show how compliance and import growth can coexist. Between the periods December 2024–February 2025 and December 2025–February 2026, nominal U.S. imports from Mexico slowed to 4.1 percent growth from 7.9 percent, even as a larger share entered duty-free under USMCA. Computers and related electronic equipment accounted for much of the increase, consistent with AI-related trade driving U.S. import growth since 2024.
Canada looks different. U.S. imports from Canada fell from about $36.3 billion monthly to $29.7 billion over the same period, even as duty-free USMCA use rose sharply. Tariff avoidance did not prevent a broad contraction in nominal trade, the economists said.
The Supreme Court's February 2026 ruling invalidating tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act changed the calculus. Those tariffs had raised the cost of entering goods outside USMCA, strengthening the incentive to comply. How U.S. trade policy adapts to the loss of that authority, and what replacement tariffs might follow, could again shift the balance between paying duties outside the agreement and operating within its tighter sourcing constraints.
Higher tariffs outside the USMCA, combined with preserved preferential access inside it, have pulled more North American trade under the agreement. Despite the costs of regional sourcing and compliance, firms operating within the USMCA enjoy an edge over competitors outside North America facing higher U.S. duties.
As the 2026 USMCA review unfolds, consultations in the United States, Mexico and Canada are setting the stage for a broad reassessment of the agreement's terms. What began as a liberalization project has moved increasingly toward conditionality and regional integration, where preferential access depends heavily on meeting regional sourcing and compliance rules.
Enrique Martínez García is an assistant vice president in the Research Department and co-director of the Global Institute at the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas. Ron Mau is a senior business economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.
Prepared with AlphaScala editorial tooling from the source reporting linked above. Indexable analysis may include a cited Alpha Score value. Publishing checks screen each story before release. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.