
White House adviser Witt says he is 'bullish' on CLARITY Act. Stablecoin rewards fight and Trump ethics provisions resurface ahead of the Sept. 15 cloture vote.
White House crypto adviser Patrick Witt said he remains "optimistic and bullish" on the CLARITY Act ahead of a planned September vote. The legislation faces renewed disagreements over stablecoin rewards and ethics provisions tied to President Donald Trump's cryptocurrency interests.
Witt spoke Tuesday at the annual SALT conference in Wyoming. He said the White House expects to work with Democratic lawmakers during the August recess to resolve remaining disagreements before the Senate considers the legislation.
"We'll be sitting down with Democrats and really trying to hash out the areas where there are disagreements and get a solid vote on the 15th," Witt said.
The Senate has scheduled a cloture vote for September 15. That gives lawmakers several weeks to negotiate the remaining issues.
The more than 600-page CLARITY Act would establish a federal regulatory framework for the cryptocurrency industry. The legislation has faced repeated delays as lawmakers debate several contentious provisions.
Stablecoin rewards resurface
One of the biggest disagreements has centered on stablecoin rewards. The question is whether platforms should be allowed to compensate users for holding stablecoins.
The issue has created tension between the cryptocurrency industry and traditional banking institutions. Both sides are pushing for different approaches to how stablecoin-based rewards should be regulated.
Earlier this year, Democratic Sen. Angela Alsobrooks and Republican Sen. Thom Tillis reached a compromise intended to resolve the dispute. Under the proposed framework, platforms would not be permitted to pay rewards simply because a user holds a stablecoin. Rewards could still be provided in connection with transactions and payments.
That compromise appeared to settle one of the biggest obstacles facing the legislation.
Senate Banking Committee Chair Tim Scott, a Republican from South Carolina, said Tuesday that the stablecoin issue has resurfaced. Speaking on a separate panel at the Wyoming conference, Scott suggested lawmakers would need to revisit the matter before the September vote.
"We thought it [stablecoin issue] was all settled," Scott said. He argued the remaining disagreements have once again become a significant part of the negotiations.
The renewed debate creates another obstacle for lawmakers who had hoped to use the August recess to prepare the legislation for a vote.
For the crypto industry, the stablecoin provisions are particularly important. The rules could influence how platforms structure rewards, payments and other services around dollar-pegged digital assets.
For banks, the issue is closely tied to competition. Stablecoins increasingly overlap with traditional financial services, particularly payments and deposits. The regulatory treatment of rewards has become a major point of contention.
Ethics provisions and Trump's crypto interests
Democratic lawmakers have also pushed for stronger ethics provisions addressing Trump's expanding cryptocurrency interests. The issue comes as the White House continues to engage directly with the cryptocurrency industry. Trump's upcoming meeting with crypto executives adds another political backdrop to the debate.
Earlier negotiations produced language that would prohibit public officials and government employees, along with their spouses, from issuing or sponsoring digital assets. The proposal would still allow officials to invest in digital assets. The restriction would expire in January 2029.
Trump has agreed to an earlier version of the ethics provision. Lawmakers are now considering additional language proposed by Democratic Sen. Ruben Gallego and Republican Sen. Thom Tillis. The latest proposal would give state attorneys general authority to enforce the provision.
Trump is currently weighing the proposal.
Sen. Cynthia Lummis, a Republican from Wyoming and one of Congress' most prominent cryptocurrency advocates, said she does not know how Trump will respond to the latest ethics proposal. She argued the president has already accepted significant restrictions.
"I don't know what he'll do, but I can tell you he's already agreed to more than any president in history," Lummis said during the Wyoming panel.
The path to September 15
Republicans want to move forward with comprehensive cryptocurrency legislation. Democrats are seeking additional safeguards around conflicts of interest and the treatment of digital assets. The administration needs enough bipartisan support to overcome procedural hurdles in the Senate.
The scheduled September 15 cloture vote is now the next major milestone for the CLARITY Act. The deadline is particularly significant because expectations for the legislation have weakened in recent weeks. The White House has maintained a more optimistic stance.
Lawmakers are currently on their August recess. They are expected to return in mid-September before leaving again in October. That leaves a relatively narrow window for both sides to resolve the remaining disputes.
Witt's comments suggest the White House believes a compromise remains achievable. The return of the stablecoin rewards debate shows negotiations are not yet finished. The unresolved ethics provisions could add another layer of uncertainty.
For the cryptocurrency industry, the stakes are significant. The CLARITY Act would establish a broader federal framework for digital assets, potentially providing greater regulatory certainty for exchanges, token issuers and other crypto businesses.
The Senate cloture vote is scheduled for September 15.
Prepared with AlphaScala editorial tooling from the source reporting linked above. Indexable analysis may include a cited Alpha Score value. Publishing checks screen each story before release. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.