
PPP lawmaker Song Eon-seok submitted an amendment to remove digital asset tax rules. A 50,000-signature petition forced parliamentary review of the 22% levy.
South Korea's planned 22% crypto gains tax may never take effect. The main opposition People Power Party (PPP) has introduced a bill to remove all digital asset taxation from the Income Tax Act before the levy begins in 2027. A public petition crossing 50,000 signatures on May 21 forced the National Assembly to formally review the proposal through its Finance and Economic Committee.
If the bill passes, crypto investors in South Korea will face no special capital gains tax on digital asset profits, matching the treatment of most retail stock traders. For one of the world's largest retail crypto markets, the reversal signals a significant regulatory shift.
Pressure against the tax intensified sharply after a public petition demanding its cancellation surpassed 50,000 signatures on May 21. That threshold now requires the National Assembly to formally review the issue through its Finance and Economic Committee. The procedural trigger gave the PPP political cover to move quickly.
PPP lawmaker Song Eon-seok submitted an amendment to South Korea’s Income Tax Act on May 18. The bill removes all digital asset taxation rules currently included under the Act. Song argued the existing proposal unfairly targets crypto investors compared to traditional stock traders.
Under the current plan, crypto investors would pay a 20% capital gains tax plus an additional 2% local tax on annual profits above 2.5 million won, roughly $1,650. The proposed amendment would eliminate every provision specifically targeting digital assets.
Most retail stock investors in South Korea currently pay zero capital gains tax on trading profits unless they hold very large positions. Crypto investors, however, would face a blanket tax structure with far lower exemption protections. That disparity formed the core complaint among petitioners and lawmakers.
PPP lawmaker Song Eon-seok argued the current proposal unfairly targets crypto investors relative to stock traders. The exemption threshold of 2.5 million won is far below what stock investors encounter, creating an uneven playing field that the amendment aims to eliminate.
The PPP also argued the policy could lead to double taxation. Digital assets are already treated as goods subject to value-added tax (VAT) rules in certain situations. Adding a capital gains tax on top of existing VAT obligations would effectively tax the same asset twice under different frameworks. This concern strengthened the case for complete removal rather than a revision.
Enforcement is another major concern. Lawmakers warned that tracking overseas crypto transactions and calculating acquisition costs for foreign platform users could become extremely difficult for tax authorities. South Korean investors frequently use international exchanges, and the government has limited visibility into those trades. The administrative burden of enforcing the tax across borders would be substantial.
Supporters of abolishing the tax also warn the policy could push crypto traders, startups, and investment capital outside South Korea. The country remains one of the largest retail crypto markets globally, with heavy trading activity across Bitcoin (BTC), altcoins, and stablecoins. Lawmakers now fear aggressive taxation could weaken South Korea’s position in the global digital asset industry while other countries continue easing crypto regulations.
A full removal would remove one of the key regulatory overhangs for domestic platforms. The risk of capital flight is particularly acute for a market where retail participation is outsized relative to institutional activity.
South Korean crypto exchanges such as Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, and Korbit could see sustained retail volume if the tax is scrapped. The threat of taxation had already begun to chill trading activity among smaller investors. A permanent shelving of the tax would remove the primary regulatory overhang for these platforms.
South Korea is a major hub for altcoin trading, with retail investors often trading coins that carry a “kimchi premium” relative to global prices. Stablecoin usage also remains high. If the tax is permanently shelved, expect continued on-chain and exchange-based activity from Korean retail traders, particularly in altcoin pairs and KRW stablecoin pairs. For broader crypto market analysis, the outcome of this review matters because Korean retail volume often moves altcoin markets globally.
So far, the ruling Democratic Party has not fully supported or rejected the proposal. Officials confirmed the bill will now undergo parliamentary review as pressure from retail investors continues building. The Democratic Party’s position will determine whether the tax is truly killed or only delayed. If the party opposes the amendment, the existing tax structure remains on the books.
The original tax was scheduled to take effect in 2027, giving lawmakers time to negotiate. The PPP’s amendment accelerates the debate. If the bill fails, investors will face the 22% levy on profits above the low threshold. The parliamentary review is the next concrete signal. The Finance and Economic Committee hearings will indicate whether the tax dies or survives.
South Korea’s crypto tax saga is far from over. The parliamentary review will test whether a country with outsized retail crypto participation can avoid the capital flight risks that other jurisdictions have documented. For now, the market watches the committee hearings, which will provide the next clear signal on the tax’s fate.
Prepared with AlphaScala research tooling and grounded in primary market data: live prices, fundamentals, SEC filings, hedge-fund holdings, and insider activity. Each story is checked against AlphaScala publishing rules before release. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.