
A new study by Nobel winner Daron Acemoglu and colleagues finds that declining birth rates raise GDP per worker by 26.8% per percentage-point drop, fully offsetting population decline.
The prevailing worry about declining birth rates may be misplaced. A new study by four economists, including 2024 Nobel laureate Daron Acemoglu, finds that aging and shrinking populations have historically raised output per worker and left aggregate GDP broadly unchanged.
The paper, distributed by the National Bureau of Economic Research, challenges the assumption that lower birth rates slow growth and innovation. The authors – Acemoglu, David Autor, Keelan Beirne and Andrew Scott – argue that workers and companies turn to technology to compensate for a smaller labor force. That response raises productivity enough to offset the drag from population decline.
“Our findings challenge the prevailing pessimism: lower birth rates, and the aging and shrinking populations they have produced, have raised rather than lowered GDP per ‘worker,’” the authors write. The gain “has been large enough to fully offset the negative effect of population decline, leaving aggregate GDP broadly unaffected.”
Birth rates have fallen across every continent over the past 70 years. Globally, the rate dropped from 3.78 per 100 people in 1950 to 1.71 last year. Each percentage-point decline led to a 26.8% increase in GDP per worker, the study found.
The mechanism runs through technology. “In cross-country data, declining birth rates lead to higher total factor productivity, larger capital stocks, a shift toward exports in high-tech industries, and more labour-saving patenting,” the authors write.
In the United States, the result has been a shift of workers toward high-tech industries and an increase in patents for labor-saving inventions. “It is this technological response that produces the positive relationship between baby busts and subsequent growth booms,” the authors argue.
The team tested other possible channels – more women entering the workforce, a faster transition from agriculture to manufacturing – but found no evidence those played a significant role.
Acemoglu and Autor are economics professors at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Beirne is a doctoral student there. Scott is an economics professor at the London Business School.
Prepared with AlphaScala research tooling and grounded in primary market data: live prices, fundamentals, SEC filings, hedge-fund holdings, and insider activity. Each story is checked against AlphaScala publishing rules before release. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.