
South Korea will not open corporate crypto markets without custody infrastructure meeting global standards, lawmakers and fintech leaders said at a July 23 National Assembly seminar. BDACS CEO cited FTX collapse as evidence for separating trading and asset safekeeping.
South Korean policymakers and fintech leaders at a National Assembly seminar on July 23 laid out a clear condition for corporate crypto participation: custody infrastructure that meets global standards, or no market access.
The event, co-hosted by Democratic Party lawmakers Hyun-jung Kim and Do-geol Ahn, brought together regulators from the Financial Services Commission and the Korea Financial Intelligence Unit, along with exchange operators, custodians, and legal experts. The Korea Fintech Industry Association (KORFIN) organized the session under the theme "Opening the Corporate Market and Building a Safe Digital Asset Ecosystem."
Rep. Kim opened with a pointed warning. "Now that corporate participation is becoming a reality, the key is how to open the market safely," she said, citing hacks and weak internal controls as recurring risks. She called for custody systems that align with international norms and pledged support for the second phase of digital asset legislation, often discussed as a "Basic Digital Asset Act" roadmap.
BDACS CEO Hong-yeol Ryu made the most direct argument for structural separation. He pointed to the collapses of FTX and Mt. Gox as evidence of what happens when trading and asset safekeeping are not effectively separated. "For institutionally scaled capital to enter more reliably, the market needs trusted and independent custodians that can provide segregated storage, operational controls, and transparent risk management," Ryu said.
Kyobo Securities executive director Hee-jin Shin pushed for a phased approach to institutional readiness. The country is in a transition period toward an institutional-investor era, she said. Simply allowing market access does not establish trust. The framework must cover the full lifecycle of participation, from investment decision processes and custody standards to incident response and clearly defined liability in the event of losses.
A panel discussion co-chaired by professors Seok-jin Hwang of Dongguk University and Jong-seob Lee of Seoul National University included FSC director Seong-jin Kim, FIU senior officer Tae-ho Jeong, Korea Institute of Finance senior researcher Jeong-doo Lee, and representatives from law firms and industry. The conversation centered on what "trust infrastructure" should look like in practice: custody supervision, corporate governance requirements, compliance obligations, and a clearer allocation of responsibility among service providers.
Participants broadly agreed that corporate involvement could improve market liquidity and stability. The caveat was consistent across every session: those benefits depend on the quality of market plumbing. Speakers converged on the need to strengthen custody infrastructure, formalize corporate internal control systems, and establish unambiguous accountability structures.
KORFIN chair Jong-hyun Kim said the association plans to promote collaboration across market participants and strengthen policy communication to help South Korea's digital asset industry build global competitiveness.
The legislative timeline for the Basic Digital Asset Act remains uncertain. The policy direction is now public: custody is the prerequisite, not an afterthought.
<Copyright ⓒ TokenPost, unauthorized reproduction and redistribution prohibited>
Drafted by a large language model from the source reporting linked above, then screened by automated publishing checks. It is not read by a journalist before publication. Some articles cite our Alpha Score. Verify prices and figures against the original source. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.