
The new U.S. legislation targets conflict-of-interest concerns tied to digital assets. Sponsors say it would end profiteering by elected officials.
A U.S. Senate bill would bar the president, vice president, and members of Congress from issuing digital assets while in office, targeting conflicts of interest tied to crypto. The measure was introduced as S. 1668.
Sponsors led by Senator Jeff Merkley and Senator Chuck Schumer said the bill would end crypto corruption by elected officials, according to their office. Senator Mark Kelly described the effort as a stop to crypto profiteering by government officials.
The bill names the president and other senior federal officials. It prohibits issuing digital assets and profiting from endorsements during a term. The exact list of covered officeholders depends on the bill's definitions, which the sponsors have not yet detailed.
Lawmakers have previously advanced a similar restriction on prediction markets, proposing a ban on the president and members of Congress from trading those contracts. The two efforts together signal a broader push to wall off senior officials from emerging financial products where policy influence could create personal gain.
The restriction targets conflict-of-interest concerns. An officeholder could benefit financially from an asset whose value they may influence through legislation or regulation. The framing centers on official conduct, not crypto ownership by the general public.
The stated goal is to reduce the appearance of self-dealing and protect public trust. Public Citizen has separately renewed calls for investigations into crypto corruption, reflecting outside pressure aligned with the bill's ethics rationale.
The bill brings together digital asset policy and federal ethics rules. It concerns how officials conduct themselves, not a prohibition on the digital asset industry as a whole.
The measure enters a federal crypto policy debate already crowded with market structure legislation and industry lobbying. Enforcement mechanisms, penalties, and implementation timelines are not detailed in the available materials. The sponsors have not announced a committee markup date.
Drafted by a large language model from the source reporting linked above, then screened by automated publishing checks. It is not read by a journalist before publication. Some articles cite our Alpha Score. Verify prices and figures against the original source. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.