
SkyBridge Capital's Anthony Scaramucci says the CLARITY Act's ban on officials sponsoring crypto is too narrow. He wants the same ethics standard applied to insider trading in all markets.
Anthony Scaramucci says the CLARITY Act's new ban on federal officials sponsoring crypto doesn't go far enough. The SkyBridge Capital founder argues the same ethics logic should extend to insider trading across the board, not just digital assets.
"If you can't sponsor a crypto bill because you hold the token, you also shouldn't trade stocks on non-public information," Scaramucci said. The bill, introduced in the House last week, prohibits members of Congress and executive branch officials from sponsoring or promoting specific digital asset legislation if they or their immediate family hold the asset in question.
Scaramucci's critique zeroes in on what he called a loophole: the bill targets crypto-specific conflicts but leaves the broader insider-trading framework untouched. "The public sees a double standard," he said. "One rule for digital assets, another for everything else."
The CLARITY Act is scheduled for a committee markup in June. Scaramucci said he plans to submit written testimony urging the panel to expand its scope.
Drafted by a large language model from the source reporting linked above, then screened by automated publishing checks. It is not read by a journalist before publication. Some articles cite our Alpha Score. Verify prices and figures against the original source. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.