
Draft Law No. 1194918-8, nearing final Duma votes, legalizes unlimited crypto settlement for companies bypassing sanctions while capping most Russians at $3,800 a year in purchases and phasing out peer-to-peer trading.
Russia's State Duma is set to finalize a cryptocurrency law that draws a hard line between two kinds of users. Draft law No. 1194918-8, which cleared its first reading 327-13 in April and was scheduled for its decisive second and third readings on July 21, legalizes digital assets for cross-border corporate settlement while capping ordinary Russians at roughly $3,800 a year in crypto purchases. The domestic ban on using crypto for payments stays in place.
The design is straightforward. Russian companies gain explicit legal authority to settle with foreign counterparties in digital assets, with no purchase limits attached. Kaplan Panesh, deputy chair of the Duma's budget committee, described the purpose when the bill passed its first reading: the channel exists so Russian firms can pay partners abroad while working around sanctions restrictions. Crypto settlement needs no correspondent bank and no SWIFT access, and the law converts a practice that has existed informally for years into licensed state infrastructure overseen by the Bank of Russia.
The retail half looks very different. A non-qualified investor, the default status for most Russians, may buy up to 300,000 rubles of crypto per year through a single licensed intermediary and transfer no more than 100,000 rubles abroad annually. Qualified investors, defined by income and asset thresholds, get 3 million rubles for purchases and 1 million for transfers, roughly $38,000 and $12,700. Everyone must pass a risk-awareness test and trade only highly liquid assets such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, and USDT. Peer-to-peer trading, the channel through which most Russian crypto activity has flowed for a decade, is being phased out by July 2027.
The mechanics matter because they reveal the state's priorities. The law classifies digital currency as property rather than legal tender, and the ruble remains the only lawful means of payment inside Russia. Licensed platforms double as tax agents, collecting income tax on gains at source. Lawmakers dropped an earlier requirement that holders disclose wallet addresses, replacing it with reporting on balances and transaction volumes. They added a provision allowing certain large transfers to foreign or third-party accounts to be held for up to 48 hours.
Anatoly Aksakov, chairman of the Duma's Financial Markets Committee, confirmed the plan to adopt both remaining readings in a single day on July 21. A Duma passage sends the bill to the Federation Council, which has 14 days to approve, then to President Putin for signature within another 14. Aksakov expects the full sequence to take roughly two weeks. Main provisions take effect September 1, 2026, pushed back from an original July 1 target after coordination delays between agencies. Unlicensed platforms get until July 2027 before the licensing perimeter closes.
The logic behind the asymmetry is not hard to read. Since 2022, sanctions have severed most Russian banks from Western correspondent networks and turned dollar and euro settlement into a high-risk exercise for any counterparty touching the US financial system. Crypto rails route around those obstacles. Russian firms have been using Tether on Tron and other channels informally for years. The law does not create that activity. It legalizes and supervises what already exists.
The retail caps address a different problem. A state fighting sanctions needs its currency used and its capital controls respected. Every ruble converted to USDT is a ruble that can leave without permission, and lawmakers described the bill as designed with preservation of the ruble in mind. The $3,800 ceiling, the P2P phase-out, the licensed intermediaries that report balances and collect taxes, all of it reads as capital controls wearing investor protection's language.
The taxation layer ties both halves together. Making licensed platforms tax agents means the legal market's gains get withheld at source, like salary. For the treasury, a capped, supervised, tax-withheld investment channel is a clean fiscal pipe. It converts a population's crypto curiosity, which the state could not extinguish, into a revenue line the state fully controls. The corporate channel carries its own reporting and levies, giving the fiscal system visibility into flows that previously lived entirely offshore.
Three things will determine what this law becomes in practice. The first is the Bank of Russia's implementing rules. The statute sets the perimeter; the central bank decides which assets count as sufficiently liquid for retail, how qualification thresholds get applied, how aggressively the 48-hour holds are used, and which platforms receive licenses. The Bank of Russia has spent a decade as the most crypto-hostile institution in the Russian state. A regime this discretionary can run permissive or punitive on the same legal text.
The second is the volume through the corporate channel. Russia's annual trade is roughly $700 billion, and whatever share eventually routes through licensed crypto settlement will define the law's significance to the global system. The infrastructure signals to watch are licensed settlement platforms, ruble-stablecoin experiments, and exchange partnerships in friendly jurisdictions. The Western response, particularly secondary-sanctions pressure on counterparties using the channel, is the obvious countermove.
The third is the September 1 boundary and the July 2027 cliff. Between those dates, Russia runs a natural experiment in whether a capped legal market can absorb an uncapped gray one. Exchange data, P2P premiums, and enforcement patterns will show which way the flow runs.
This is a law that legalizes crypto for the Russian state's problems and rations it for the Russian public. It is not a model any government will admit to copying. It is a model whose logic every capital-controlling state on earth will study.
Drafted by a large language model from the source reporting linked above, then screened by automated publishing checks. It is not read by a journalist before publication. Some articles cite our Alpha Score. Verify prices and figures against the original source. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.