
Global refining capacity lost 3 million bpd from 2020–2023, a shortfall that now compounds the oil supply crisis, Saudi Aramco's VP said. Retaining refineries would have helped.
Saudi Aramco has identified a missing piece in the oil supply crisis narrative: the downstream. Musaab Almulla, the company's vice president for energy and economic insights, told the Middle East Oil and Gas Conference in London that global refining capacity lost about 3 million barrels per day between 2020 and 2023. Retaining those refineries, he argued, would have helped mitigate the current supply disruption.
The naive market read blames the oil supply crisis entirely on crude production cuts by OPEC+ or geopolitical disruptions in the Middle East. The better read goes deeper. Even if crude flows increase, the lack of refinery capacity means product markets face their own bottlenecks. That dynamic separates crude prices from refined product prices and keeps crack spreads elevated. Traders watching only WTI and Brent risk missing a structural change in the downstream chain.
The lost capacity stems from permanent closures during the pandemic, when lockdowns destroyed demand and forced refiners to shutter plants. Many of those refineries, especially in Europe and North America, had already been under pressure from tightening environmental regulations and competition from newer, more complex plants in Asia and the Middle East. Almulla's comment that retaining them could have helped is a direct acknowledgment that the industry misjudged the speed of demand recovery. A 2020–2023 timeline means these are not temporary turnarounds; they are permanent capacity exits.
Demand for refined products has proven resilient. Jet fuel, diesel, and gasoline consumption remain near or above pre-COVID levels in many regions, according to trade flows and public inventory data. This demand persistence, combined with a smaller capacity base, effectively creates a supply squeeze in the product market. Simple arithmetic – with 3 million bpd less capacity, the same demand requires either higher utilization of remaining plants, more imports, or higher prices to ration consumption. The recent spikes in middle-distillate prices in Europe and Asia fit this pattern.
For traders, the inference is direct. If the refining bottleneck is structural rather than temporary, then refining margins – the difference between crude input and product output – should stay wider than historical averages. This benefits refiners with higher complexity that can process cheaper heavy or sour crude. It also means that any new crude supply coming online may not translate into lower gasoline or diesel prices at the pump. The Brent Surges 2.5% as Middle East Tensions Rekindle Risk Premium article captured the crude side; this adds the product side.
The read-through for the sector is not uniform. Simple refineries with limited conversion capacity face tighter economics if they cannot access light sweet crude or lack petrochemical integration. Complex facilities, particularly those with cokers and hydrocrackers, can capture the widening spread between heavy and light crude and between crude and products. The downstream investment theme that Almulla highlighted is exactly this: the industry needs more capacity, particularly in regions with growing demand.
The next decision point for traders monitoring this theme is the upcoming OPEC+ meeting and the release of monthly refining data from the IEA and EIA. If crude production is increased but product inventories continue to draw, the bottleneck thesis gains credibility. Conversely, if demand softens due to a global economic slowdown, the capacity loss becomes less binding. Saudi Aramco itself is pressing ahead with its Jazan refinery complex and petrochemical integration, a bet that the downstream margin environment justifies new capacity. For a broader view of the sector, the commodities analysis page tracks these structural shifts.
Prepared with AlphaScala research tooling and grounded in primary market data: live prices, fundamentals, SEC filings, hedge-fund holdings, and insider activity. Each story is checked against AlphaScala publishing rules before release. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.