
Raghuram Rajan argues AI displacement will be gradual but firms must retrain workers. He proposes a tax on AI tokens and training credits to ease the transition.
Artificial intelligence will displace jobs, but no one knows how fast or how far, Raghuram Rajan wrote in a recent essay. The University of Chicago professor and former Reserve Bank of India governor laid out a case that is neither apocalyptic nor dismissive. The pace of adoption, he argued, depends on how quickly firms integrate AI into existing workflows – and that is proving harder than the technology's raw capability might suggest.
A U.S. Census Bureau survey cited by Rajan found that only 20% of firms with fewer than 20 employees use AI today. Among businesses with at least 250 workers, the share rises to 37%. Even that figure is low, Rajan noted, given the survey's low bar – it asks whether AI is used "in any business function."
The bottleneck is integration. Rajan said companies need models trained not just on existing data but adaptive to new data generated through everyday use. Uncertainty over cost is another drag. Many large firms are running pilots and delaying hiring or firing decisions until they see a clearer picture. Competitive pressures will eventually force broader adoption, he predicted.
But the employment picture is not uniformly grim. If companies keep producing the same goods and services, AI will behave like any historical technology. Some jobs vanish; others become more productive and interesting as drudgery is removed; entirely new roles emerge, Rajan wrote. He invoked the Jevons effect: if AI adoption raises productivity, firms can cut prices and boost sales, which in turn creates more jobs.
AI may also spawn new businesses. A would-be entrepreneur who needs a web programmer and an accountant can now use AI for both, lowering startup costs. Rajan pointed to a pandemic-era rise in new business formation that has continued in recent quarters.
David Autor's work, cited by Rajan, suggests AI can equip moderately skilled workers with higher-order abilities – a nurse practitioner using medical AI to diagnose more conditions is one example. Given the enormous global demand for healthcare and other services, further job creation is possible.
Still, even a mild version of the "jobocalypse" needs a policy response to maintain social solidarity, Rajan argued. Corporations should be enlisted, because they know best what new roles their employees can train for.
His first policy prescription: fix the tax system's bias against human labor. A U.S. firm pays social-security taxes for each worker but not for AI. To level the field, Rajan proposed a tax on the AI tokens a firm uses. The rate would have to be set carefully to avoid stifling deployment. Tracking domestic AI providers is straightforward; foreign providers would require a broader net, but that is solvable, he wrote.
Recognizing that the first wave of displacement won't be the last, Rajan called for periodic retraining and retention. He suggested a tax credit for additional training, with one-third of the value usable each year the worker stays employed. To target AI adopters, the credit could be applied only to offset the token tax.
More important than tax incentives is a corporate commitment to helping employees navigate an uncertain future, Rajan wrote. As employment uncertainty rises, even top candidates may hesitate to accept offers from an employer that could replace them with AI at any time.
There is some evidence that employers are paying attention. Rajan cited ongoing work with Luigi Zingales and Pietro Ramella that tracks the share of U.S. Fortune 150 CEOs who declare in letters to shareholders that they care about employee development. That share rose from about 20% in 2008 to 44% in 2023.
It could all be cheap talk, Rajan conceded. But he hopes not. The more seriously corporations treat what he called "the defining business challenge of our time" – providing good jobs for humans – the better the prospects for a future of widespread prosperity.
Prepared with AlphaScala editorial tooling from the source reporting linked above. Indexable analysis may include a cited Alpha Score value. Publishing checks screen each story before release. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.