
Patagonia sued drag queen Pattie Gonia over a trademark application. Three lawyers explain why the brand faces a higher legal bar than the public debate suggests.
Patagonia sued drag queen Pattie Gonia in January over a trademark application. The apparel company says the activist's plan to sell merchandise under the name violates a prior agreement. Pattie Gonia says no such agreement existed.
The case has moved from the courthouse to social media. Pattie Gonia posted a video last week accusing the brand of trying to "erase an activist." Patagonia posted a statement saying it did not want to sue but had to protect its trademark from bad actors.
The two sides have traded settlement terms publicly. Pattie Gonia says she will drop the trademark pursuit if Patagonia drops the lawsuit. Patagonia says it will drop the suit if she abandons all trademark applications, stops using its logos, and stops selling merchandise under the name.
Three trademark lawyers spoke with Out about the legal standing. The consensus: Patagonia faces a higher bar than the public debate suggests.
The confusion problem
Alexandra J. Roberts, a law professor at Northeastern University, says Patagonia's biggest hurdle is proving "likelihood of consumer confusion." The company must show that buyers would believe Pattie Gonia's merchandise is affiliated with, licensed by, or authorized by Patagonia.
The name itself works against that argument. "Patagonia and Pattie Gonia are certainly not identical, and they're both references to a place, a geographic region," Roberts said. "It's not the case that this is a made-up term like Xerox or Excedrin. It's an existing word that links to a particular geographic spot, which I think makes it more viable that consumers will expect there could be more than one user."
The dilution claim is weaker
Patagonia also filed a federal trademark dilution claim. That requires proving the mark is famous among the general public, not just environmentalists or outdoor enthusiasts. Roberts said that is a difficult argument even if Patagonia qualifies as famous, because "the marks are not identical. Pattie is a female name; there's a space between. I think those things undercut the dilution claim."
Rebecca Tushnet, a Harvard Law School professor who practiced intellectual property law, agreed. She called dilution a "made-up idea that trademark owners got Congress to adopt" to argue that similar names create confusion about which brand is which. "Because it's made up, nobody really knows what dilution is. It's even hard to predict that infringement," she said.
The 'duty to police' myth
Online commenters have argued that Patagonia must sue to deter bad actors, or risk weakening its trademark. Both Roberts and Tushnet rejected that framing. "The myth of the duty to police is overblown – this idea that you have to go after every use of your mark or every use of something similar to maintain your rights, that's just not really true," Roberts said. Tushnet was blunter: "Yeah, that's dumb."
The counterargument
Carmel Imani, founder of Imani Law, which works with small businesses, said Patagonia should defend its trademark. "If they didn't file this lawsuit, their trademark weakens," she said. "Let's say they allow Pattie Gonia to move forward in the clothing category, you're going to have other brands come in that sound similar to it."
Imani also noted that Patagonia attached screenshots of consumer confusion in its complaint. "Marketplace confusion is the best evidence," she said.
What this means for other drag names
The lawyers agreed that drag queens who parody well-known brands – Trixie Mattel, Brita Filter, Jan Sport – are safe as long as they do not use another company's trademark. The risk comes when a performer applies for a trademark registration. Tushnet's advice: "If you're a parodist, don't apply for a trademark registration. The Patent and Trademark Office has no sense of humor."
Prepared with AlphaScala research tooling and grounded in primary market data: live prices, fundamentals, SEC filings, hedge-fund holdings, and insider activity. Each story is checked against AlphaScala publishing rules before release. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.