Oracle shares hit a 52-week low after Q4 revenue missed consensus and cloud growth slowed. The forward P/E sits at 18.5x, below the five-year average, as analyst targets have been cut. The next catalyst is the August 28 earnings call.
Oracle shares closed at $118.40 on Wednesday, a 52-week low and roughly a third below the June 2025 peak of $176.50. The selloff followed the company's fiscal fourth-quarter report on June 10, where revenue of $14.3 billion missed the $14.5 billion consensus. The cloud infrastructure segment, the core of the AI narrative, grew 21% year-over-year, a deceleration from the 25% pace in the prior quarter.
At least five sell-side firms cut price targets after the print. Morgan Stanley lowered its target to $155 from $185, citing a slower-than-expected ramp in Gen2 cloud capacity. Goldman Sachs dropped its target to $150 from $175, noting that the margin expansion story hinges on the pace of data-center buildout. The average analyst target now sits at $148, down from $190 at the start of the year.
The forward P/E has fallen to 18.5x, below the five-year average of 22x and near the lowest multiple since 2022. The stock trades at a discount to Microsoft (30x) and Amazon (28x). The gap reflects real uncertainty about whether Oracle can close the capacity gap in cloud infrastructure fast enough to capture the next wave of enterprise AI workloads.
Oracle's Alpha Score sits at 36 out of 100, a "Mixed" label that captures the tension between its valuation and the execution risk in cloud. The score weighs earnings momentum and analyst revisions, both of which have deteriorated over the past month.
The next scheduled catalyst is the fiscal first-quarter earnings call on August 28. Oracle has guided for revenue of $14.0 to $14.2 billion and adjusted EPS of $1.45 to $1.49. A beat on the top line or a faster-than-expected ramp in cloud capacity would test whether the 52-week low is a buying opportunity or a value trap.
Drafted by a large language model from the source reporting linked above, then screened by automated publishing checks. It is not read by a journalist before publication. Some articles cite our Alpha Score. Verify prices and figures against the original source. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.