
Taj Tarsha, founder of NFT startup Few and Far, faces securities and wire fraud charges for allegedly diverting $10M from investors to gambling, real estate, and DJ activities.
Federal prosecutors charged NFT startup founder Taj Tarsha with securities fraud and wire fraud, alleging he diverted more than $10 million raised from nearly 70 investors into gambling, digital-asset speculation, and a loan for a Miami condominium. The 34-year-old Miami resident founded Few and Far Limited, pitched as a decentralized NFT marketplace. Each charge carries up to 20 years in prison. Tarsha has not been convicted.
Prosecutors said Few and Far raised the money by selling 95 million tokens through Simple Agreements for Future Tokens, or SAFTs. Investors paid for contractual rights to receive FAR tokens later, expecting their capital to fund development of the NFT platform. According to the charges, Tarsha used investor funds for personal expenses almost immediately after the fundraising closed. The alleged misuse included gambling, speculative digital-asset purchases, a loan tied to a Miami condominium, interior design costs, and his DJ activities.
The alleged diversion came to light more than a year after Tarsha began soliciting investments, when an audit uncovered discrepancies in the company's finances. Prosecutors also claimed he misled investors by stating employee bonuses were linked to predetermined FAR token presale targets. Behind the appearance of growth, the company had reportedly dismissed nearly its entire workforce. Authorities said Tarsha instructed the remaining contractor to perform tasks that merely created the impression that marketplace development was continuing.
The case was assigned to U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan in New York, who previously presided over the sentencing of former FTX chief executive Sam Bankman-Fried. Kaplan now oversees another high-profile digital-asset fraud prosecution, this time centered on token fundraising for an NFT business. The charges apply conventional securities and wire-fraud laws to a structure that promised future digital tokens rather than equity or debt.
Legal experts said the case tests whether SAFT-based fundraising can be prosecuted under traditional fraud statutes when the underlying product involves NFTs. The central question at trial will be whether prosecutors can prove Tarsha intentionally deceived investors about the use of their money and the actual progress of Few and Far.
The case adds to a growing list of crypto fraud prosecutions that rely on established financial laws rather than new legislation. For a broader view of how regulatory actions and market developments shape the crypto space, see AlphaScala's crypto market analysis.
Drafted by a large language model from the source reporting linked above, then screened by automated publishing checks. It is not read by a journalist before publication. Some articles cite our Alpha Score. Verify prices and figures against the original source. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.