
The Massachusetts Senate voted to ban crypto ATMs statewide after FBI data showed $6.8M in kiosk scam losses in 2025. The ban's fate depends on House negotiations.
The Massachusetts Senate voted late Thursday to ban crypto ATMs across the state, attaching the measure as an amendment to a broad economic development bill.
The vote follows FBI data showing kiosk-related scam losses in Massachusetts totaled $6,834,561 in 2025, based on 296 complaints. The machines, which look like standard cash dispensers, sit in hundreds of convenience stores, pharmacies, and liquor stores across the state. Consumer advocates and elderly residents say the unregulated machines have become a cash pipeline for scammers.
Norfolk County Sheriff Patrick McDermott described the typical pattern. A victim gets a call or text, then is pressured into moving savings into Bitcoin. Cash goes into the machine, a QR code from the caller gets scanned, and the deposit converts and routes to an anonymous wallet in seconds. "Once the cash is in there, it's gone for good," McDermott said.
FBI data for 2025 shows about $19,000 in reported losses per day across Massachusetts. The bureau's national total for kiosk scams reached $389 million over the past year.
AARP Massachusetts pushed for the crackdown. "A ban on crypto ATMs is now the most effective way to stop the ongoing damage," state director Jen Benson said in a statement Thursday.
Massachusetts is the only New England state without written rules for crypto kiosks. Vermont, Minnesota, Indiana, and Tennessee banned the machines outright. Another 28 states impose some form of restriction.
The absence of local rules has drawn operators into the state, McDermott said. He called the ban "the only lever available until real regulation exists."
The ban's fate is uncertain. The Senate passed the amendment as part of its economic development bill late Thursday. The House has considered similar language twice, once in its version of the bill and once in an earlier budget proposal. It fell both times. The final outcome depends on negotiations between the two chambers.
Drafted by a large language model from the source reporting linked above, then screened by automated publishing checks. It is not read by a journalist before publication. Some articles cite our Alpha Score. Verify prices and figures against the original source. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.