
Thune pushed the CLARITY Act vote to September. Lummis warns the delay could leave U.S. crypto markets without federal rules until nearly 2030.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune confirmed the chamber will not vote on the CLARITY Act until September, ending Senator Cynthia Lummis's push for a pre-recess floor vote. The Wyoming Republican had pressed senators to stay in Washington over the weekend to lock in a vote before the August recess. Thune pulled that timeline.
The bill sits in legislative limbo. The Senate Banking Committee approved it 15-9 on May 14 with bipartisan support, and a floor vote keeps sliding. For crypto exchanges trying to plan around clear rules, the uncertainty stretches on.
Its scope reaches beyond a tweak to existing rules. The bill would build a federal framework for digital asset markets, including how assets are classified and which agency oversees them. One concrete provision would force exchanges to hold customer cash and crypto separate from company assets. The provision responds to the Celsius bankruptcy, where customers ended up as unsecured creditors rather than owners of their funds.
Lummis dropped a revised version July 22 that runs past 300 pages. The changes came out of negotiations between the Senate Banking and Agriculture committees, with Democrats pushing for additions that include Commodity Futures Trading Commission provisions and ethics rules for senior federal officials.
Failure to pass soon carries a specific cost, in Lummis's telling. She has said the United States probably will not have federal market-structure standards for digital assets until nearly 2030. Four more years without clear rules means another four years of exchanges operating in legal gray zones and some companies setting up shop elsewhere.
Other jurisdictions have not waited. Regulatory frameworks have moved forward across parts of Europe and Asia, and U.S. companies have noticed. Some have moved operations or product launches offshore. Lummis chairs the Senate Banking Subcommittee on Digital Assets, and she has voiced frustration that the legislative calendar keeps interfering. The drift of U.S. activity toward clearer jurisdictions is a pattern crypto market analysis has tracked.
Lummis argues the current setup fails on multiple fronts. Companies lack clear guidance, and consumers lack meaningful protection. Law enforcement, she says, lacks the tools to pursue fraud in digital asset markets. The CLARITY Act tries to fix those gaps at once, which partly explains both the 300-page length and the difficulty of moving it.
When the Senate returns, Lummis plans to keep pushing. She has worked with colleagues in both parties to build support, and the committee vote gives her a concrete result to point to. Budget fights and nominations will crowd the September floor schedule, and crypto legislation does not always win those battles.
No date has been set for a vote.
The 15-9 committee margin was a real one, not a squeaker. Full Senate math is a different calculation, and passage is not assured.
Drafted by a large language model from the source reporting linked above, then screened by automated publishing checks. It is not read by a journalist before publication. Some articles cite our Alpha Score. Verify prices and figures against the original source. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.