
The CLARITY Act could grant the CFTC authority to address prediction market growth, a lawyer told a House subcommittee. CFTC Chair Selig has claimed exclusive jurisdiction over event contracts, sparking state lawsuits.
The CLARITY Act now in the Senate could give the Commodity Futures Trading Commission the authority it needs to address the rapid growth of prediction markets, a lawyer told a House subcommittee Tuesday.
Carl Kennedy, a partner at Katten Muchin Rosenman, said the agency is too short-staffed to fully regulate platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket. The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act would grant additional powers not just for digital assets but also for the "explosive growth of prediction markets," he testified.
Kennedy spoke during a hearing on “Examining Customer Protections and Market Integrity in Sports Event Prediction Markets” before the House Agriculture Committee's Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digital Assets, and Rural Development.
“I do believe that with additional resources – they’re about to perhaps receive additional authorities under the CLARITY Act – with additional resources to address these new asset classes in the cash markets and crypto, as well as to deal with the explosive growth of prediction markets, I think that the CFTC certainly should receive additional resources,” Kennedy said.
Chair Michael Selig has taken a unilateral stance since his December Senate confirmation. He argues the CFTC has exclusive jurisdiction over event contracts, classifying them as swaps. Selig is the only Senate-confirmed member leading an agency that normally has five commissioners – a fact that has shaped his aggressive posture toward state regulators. The CFTC has one commissioner and all of crypto.
That position has triggered what several Democratic senators call an assault on state authority. Some states filed lawsuits against Kalshi and Polymarket over sports betting. Last week Selig ordered Kalshi to ignore a ruling from a Michigan court. The company said the order put it “in an impossible position” between state and federal directives.
Legal experts predict one or more of those cases could reach the U.S. Supreme Court to settle the clash between state and federal regulators over prediction markets.
Republican senators pushing for a CLARITY Act vote before the chamber breaks for August state work periods said they expect to release the bill's text soon. Details on how the legislation would address prediction markets, ethics concerns, and other issues remained unavailable as of Tuesday.
In June, gambling industry groups petitioned the Senate to add language to CLARITY “that explicitly prohibits event contracts tied to sports and casino-style gaming.” The White House also confirmed the Trump administration agreed to “the most comprehensive and wide-ranging ethics provision in history” and had “bent over backward to accommodate [Democrats’] concerns.”
Drafted by a large language model from the source reporting linked above, then screened by automated publishing checks. It is not read by a journalist before publication. Some articles cite our Alpha Score. Verify prices and figures against the original source. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.