
RSM/INTX study finds insurers spend up to $1M per system deployment, $5M in annual support, and $450K in lost productivity. Reinsurance fragmentation is the structural risk.
A field study commissioned by INTX and conducted by RSM surveyed more than 250 property and casualty insurance professionals. The findings paint a picture of an industry where inefficiency is systemic, not episodic. Billions spent on technology have not solved the core problem: a fragmented operating model.
Implementation costs are the first pain point. Organizations spend an average of up to $1 million to deploy a single system, according to the study. With most insurers running two or three such systems, total deployment costs can reach $3 million or more. More than half of system users depend on third-party integrators for training. 40% rely on them for project management and implementation.
Support costs extend well beyond licensing. Insurers pay between $100,000 and nearly $5 million annually on recurring system costs, researchers said. Nearly half of organizations report significant additional internal IT support expenses. Teams spend time maintaining outdated systems, resolving issues, and supporting users. The study estimates up to 888 hours of lost productivity each year due to system issues, with a financial impact as high as $450,000 annually.
Manual processes remain deeply embedded. 72% of respondents reported using Excel or homegrown tools to manage critical workflows. 52% of policy administration tasks require human intervention. Employees move between systems, reenter data, and reconcile information. Organizations spend between $475,000 and $1,125,000 each year on manual work, the study found.
Reinsurance is where the fragmentation hits hardest. In most organizations, risk is written first. Reinsurance is applied later. Recoverables are calculated separately. Financial impact is only understood after multiple systems are reconciled. This creates a structural disconnect between underwriting, claims, and capital. The result is delayed recoverables and incomplete exposure visibility. What should function as a strategic lever for growth instead operates as an administrative process.
Implementation timelines stretch. 45% of organizations report cycles of 18 months or longer. Even adding a new product line can take more than six months. Average satisfaction with implementations remains below 71.8%.
Over the past 15 years, U.S. property and casualty insurers have operated at an underwriting loss without investment income, with a combined ratio of 102.1%. That pattern reflects structural inefficiencies in core operations, according to the study.
Modern platforms that unify policy, claims, billing, reinsurance, and financial reporting in a single data model could address these gaps. In such a system, reinsurance is embedded at the moment of transaction. Financial impact is visible immediately. Recoverables are tracked continuously. Implementation timelines can shrink to months rather than years. New product lines can be introduced within three to six months.
The study's authors argue that the future winners will be the organizations with the fewest operational gaps, not the most systems.
Prepared with AlphaScala research tooling and grounded in primary market data: live prices, fundamentals, SEC filings, hedge-fund holdings, and insider activity. Each story is checked against AlphaScala publishing rules before release. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.