
India's parliamentary panel recommends SROs for crypto oversight under RBI or SEBI, rejecting the central bank's ban push. The interim framework covers 39 million users holding $2.4 billion.
India's crypto market just got a clearer picture of its regulatory future, and it is not the ban the central bank wanted. A parliamentary committee has recommended that industry-run Self-Regulatory Organizations oversee the sector under the Reserve Bank of India or the Securities and Exchange Board of India, rather than the outright prohibition the RBI has pushed for.
The Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance made the recommendation in its 36th report on the proposed Securities Markets Code, 2025, tabled in Parliament on July 23. The panel believes recognized SROs should enforce conduct standards while proper crypto legislation is drafted, a temporary solution for the 39 million KYC-verified users the RBI itself counted in the domestic market.
Those users hold roughly 20,437 crore rupees, about $2.4 billion, across 54 FIU-registered service providers, according to RBI data cited in the report. The committee studied the systems in the United Kingdom, Singapore, the United States, and the European Union before settling on the SRO model.
India currently has no statute recognizing digital assets as a formal asset class. What it does have is a 30% flat tax on crypto profits and a 1% tax deducted at source on transactions, plus anti-money-laundering reporting through the Financial Intelligence Unit. The Ministry of Finance told the committee that crypto-assets are outside India's regulatory purview except for taxation, AML, and reporting rules.
The recommendation comes weeks after the RBI pushed for a tougher line. The central bank told the same panel in May and June that it favors policy "leaning toward prohibition," wants banks barred from crypto exposure, and still keeps a ban on private cryptocurrencies among its options. The RBI argued that dollar-pegged stablecoins would interfere with India's monetary sovereignty.
Tax authorities agreed with the RBI. Officials told the committee that offshore trades are hard to track, with less than 25% of the 645,000 people who transacted in crypto in the year to March 2023 reporting their gains.
Critics of the current tax regime argue it has driven activity offshore. Raghav Chadha, a member of Rajya Sabha, told Parliament in February that about 73% of India's crypto volume had moved to foreign exchanges, roughly 120 million Indians use foreign platforms, and about 180 crypto startups had left the country. "Prohibition is not protection," Chadha said. "Regulation is protection."
The committee also sought clarity on legal definitions of digital assets. Some tokens may act like securities, some like derivatives, and others may belong in a different category entirely, the panel noted.
Under the proposed framework, SROs would audit exchange reserves, legally separate customer money from company balance sheets, and manage complaints. The panel expects the government to draft a full law and legal definitions for digital assets, with the interim SROs operating until that legislation is in place.
Manhar Garegrat, head of Liminal Custody, told NDTV the recommendations are "a constructive step toward building a more mature digital asset ecosystem in India."
The next steps lie with the government, which the committee expects to produce the legislation and definitions that will shape the SROs' authority.
Drafted by a large language model from the source reporting linked above, then screened by automated publishing checks. It is not read by a journalist before publication. Some articles cite our Alpha Score. Verify prices and figures against the original source. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.