
India’s finance panel recommended SROs for crypto oversight under SEBI or RBI, skipping the securities code for now. The phased approach follows months of consultations with the RBI, exchanges, and the IFSCA.
India’s Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance recommended letting the crypto industry regulate itself through Self-Regulatory Organisations (SROs) while the government drafts a comprehensive law, rather than folding digital assets directly into the proposed securities code.
The recommendation landed in the committee’s 36th Report on the Securities Markets Code, 2025, tabled in Parliament on July 23. Instead of bringing cryptocurrencies under the new securities framework immediately, the panel suggested industry-led SROs oversee the sector under a designated regulator such as SEBI or the RBI.
The committee said India needs clear legal definitions for different types of Virtual Digital Assets (VDAs), because not every crypto asset should be regulated the same way. Some may qualify as securities, others as derivatives, and some may require a separate regulatory category, the report noted.
The panel also asked the government to clarify how crypto investment products, tokenized securities, and exchanges offering tokenized assets will be treated under future rules.
“The position of the Central Government regarding crypto-assets, including Virtual Digital Assets, is that such assets are presently unregulated in India, except for the limited purposes of taxation, prevention of money laundering and reporting requirements,” the report said.
The recommendation followed months of consultations with the RBI, the Income Tax Department, the International Financial Services Centres Authority (IFSCA), crypto exchanges, and industry representatives. The committee also studied regulatory approaches in the UK, Singapore, the US, and the EU before concluding India should adopt a phased framework rather than wait for a comprehensive law.
If adopted, recognized SROs would set standards for governance, transparency, disclosures, investor protection, and grievance redressal while operating under regulatory supervision. The proposal could give exchanges and firms building tokenized financial products more regulatory certainty than the current grey area provides.
Drafted by a large language model from the source reporting linked above, then screened by automated publishing checks. It is not read by a journalist before publication. Some articles cite our Alpha Score. Verify prices and figures against the original source. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.