
IMF's Dan Katz says local-currency stablecoins on shared networks give users a frictionless route into digital dollars, citing South Africa as a case where rand-backed tokens lag.
The International Monetary Fund has warned that local-currency stablecoins, often billed as a way to preserve monetary sovereignty, could instead accelerate dollarization by giving users a frictionless path into U.S. dollar-backed digital assets.
Speaking at the University of Cape Town on August 7, First Deputy Managing Director Dan Katz argued that blockchain infrastructure changes how capital moves, reducing the effectiveness of traditional foreign exchange controls. Rather than preventing capital outflows, domestic stablecoins issued on the same networks as dollar-pegged tokens may simply hand users a route into digital dollars.
Many governments have viewed local-currency stablecoins as a digital alternative to foreign currencies, hoping they would encourage domestic payments and keep capital inside national financial systems. Katz said that assumption overlooks how decentralized blockchain markets operate. When local-currency and dollar-backed stablecoins coexist on the same network, users can swap one for the other through decentralized exchanges, automated liquidity pools, or peer-to-peer protocols. Those transactions bypass the commercial banks that traditionally monitor foreign exchange activity and enforce capital controls.
Instead of strengthening monetary independence, domestic stablecoins may become an intermediate step before users move into digital dollars that offer greater liquidity, wider acceptance, and deeper global markets.
Katz pointed to South Africa as an example of the difficulty domestic stablecoins face in competing with dollar-denominated alternatives. Adoption of U.S. dollar stablecoins remains relatively modest in the country, yet rand-backed stablecoins have attracted even less interest. The IMF said this reflects broader market dynamics rather than technological shortcomings. Several factors continue to favor dollar-backed tokens: deeper liquidity, more established merchant acceptance, and network effects that compound as more users join.
For policymakers, the takeaway is that issuing a domestic stablecoin alone may not meaningfully reduce demand for dollar-denominated digital assets.
Katz also challenged assumptions about stablecoin adoption by highlighting the gap between total transaction volume and genuine economic usage. According to figures cited from the Bank for International Settlements, stablecoins processed more than $30 trillion in transaction volume during 2025. Only around $390 billion represented real-world payments involving businesses or consumers. Headline transaction volume can create the impression that stablecoins have already become a mainstream payment network, when much of the activity still circulates within the digital asset ecosystem.
The IMF's broader recommendation is not to prohibit stablecoins but to regulate the infrastructure connecting blockchain networks with traditional finance. Katz said authorities should prioritize oversight of the gateways between crypto markets and the conventional financial system: fiat on- and off-ramps, custodial services, and the commercial banks that settle with crypto firms. Monitoring those entry points may prove more effective than attempting to restrict blockchain transactions themselves, particularly as decentralized markets continue expanding across jurisdictions.
Many emerging economies are simultaneously evaluating domestic stablecoins, central bank digital currencies, and updated digital asset legislation. The IMF's latest assessment suggests policymakers may need to reconsider whether locally issued stablecoins actually support monetary sovereignty or unintentionally encourage greater use of U.S. dollar digital assets.
Future regulatory discussions are likely to focus less on whether stablecoins should exist and more on how digital currency ecosystems interact with capital controls, foreign exchange rules, and cross-border payment infrastructure. That debate could become increasingly significant as governments modernize payment systems while stablecoin adoption expands globally. The IMF plans to publish further analysis on the intersection of stablecoins and capital-flow management ahead of its October annual meetings in Washington.
Drafted by a large language model from the source reporting linked above, then screened by automated publishing checks. It is not read by a journalist before publication. Some articles cite our Alpha Score. Verify prices and figures against the original source. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.