
Only seven ships passed through the Strait of Hormuz Thursday, down from 14, as U.S.-Iran tensions disrupt global crude flows. WTI holds above $84, Brent near $93.
Shipping through the Strait of Hormuz has fallen to a fraction of its normal volume. Only seven vessels moved through the strait on Thursday, down from 14 a day earlier, according to Kpler data. No very large crude carriers or LNG ships were counted. Before the U.S.-Iran conflict escalated, the strait handled roughly 20% of global crude and LNG trade. The near-total halt is the dominant bullish factor for both WTI and Brent.
Saudi Arabia has partially restarted loading in the Gulf. Three VLCCs loaded crude at Juaymah and Ras Tanura between August 12 and 16, but exports are still constrained by the Houthi conflict in the Red Sea. Alternative flows through Egypt's Sidi Kerir terminal are running at about 670,000 barrels per day in August, down from roughly 4 million bpd that used to move through Yanbu.
U.S. fundamentals present a contrasting picture. The EIA reported an unexpected 4.4 million barrel crude build in the latest week. Distillate inventories ended a downward trend as refinery utilization hit 97.2%, reflecting tight global supplies. The build tempers some of the bullish momentum from the Hormuz disruption.
Natural gas fundamentals are more comfortable domestically. The EIA's August 20 report showed working gas in storage at 3,169 Bcf after a 16 Bcf weekly injection. Inventories are 185 Bcf, or 6.2%, above the five-year average, which provides a buffer against supply disruptions even with high LNG exports. The backdrop for natural gas is the same as for oil: potential disruption from the Hormuz and Red Sea straits keeps global supply uncertain, while ample U.S. storage mitigates domestic shortage risk. (For a deeper look at the natural gas positioning, see Natural Gas: 207K Shorts Face Heat Test as Front-Month Holds Support.)
On the 2-hour chart, natural gas is consolidating at $2.75, right above the 50-period EMA at $2.76 and the 100-period EMA at $2.75. An ascending trendline from mid-August lows provides support. Price action between $2.84 and $2.86 has capped the recent breakout, leaving the market range-bound between the trendline and the moving average cluster. The RSI at 46 points to neutral-to-slightly bullish momentum. Resistance sits at $2.77, then $2.81, $2.84 and $2.88. On the downside, support is at $2.71 and $2.64. A break above $2.81 would bring $2.84–$2.88 into focus. A close below $2.71 would increase the likelihood of a pullback to $2.67.
WTI crude oil is trading around $86.42. The 2-hour chart shows price above the 50-period EMA at $84.82 and the 100-period EMA at $83.64, with the upper boundary of the rising channel near $87.24. Buyers are in control but have lost momentum. The RSI at 59 suggests bullish pressure without being overbought. Immediate resistance is $87.24, followed by $90.56 and $93.58. Support lies at $84.09, then $80.82 and $77.86. A break above $87.24 targets $90.56. A drop below $83.64 would signal a shift to bearish momentum.
Brent crude is trading near $93.44 after recovering from the $78 zone. Short-term price action remains bullish, with consolidation below resistance at $94.78. Price stays above the 50-period and 100-period EMAs. The RSI at 64 shows strong pressure but not yet overbought. First resistance is $94.78, then $98.65 and $102.02. Support is $91.12, followed by $86.76 and $83.30. Brent remains bullish while above $91.12. A sustained break above $94.78 makes $98.65 a likely target. A loss of the EMA cluster would signal fading momentum.
Persian Gulf security rests entirely on the U.S. and its allies. The most pessimistic scenario would see Iran attempting to close the Strait of Hormuz entirely. The EIA's next weekly inventory report, due Wednesday, will provide the next snapshot of domestic supply and demand.
Prepared with AlphaScala editorial tooling from the source reporting linked above. Indexable analysis may include a cited Alpha Score value. Publishing checks screen each story before release. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.