
Hawaii's Oct. 1 ban on cash-to-crypto kiosk deposits follows FBI data showing $3.85 million in losses from 92 resident complaints in 2025. Withdrawals and crypto-to-crypto swaps remain legal.
Hawaii will ban cash-to-crypto kiosk transactions starting Oct. 1, a move state lawmakers designed to cut off a channel that scammers use to drain victims' bank accounts. The FBI logged 92 kiosk-related complaints from Hawaii residents in 2025, with about $3.85 million in adjusted losses.
Governor Josh Green signed House Bill 1642 on July 9 as Act 224. The law prohibits operators from owning, managing, or running a kiosk that accepts U.S. currency in exchange for a digital financial asset. Each prohibited transaction counts as a separate offense under the state's consumer protection law, which sits in Chapter 481B of the Revised Statutes governing unfair and deceptive practices.
Despite some reports describing the measure as a total crypto ATM ban, the enacted text covers deposits used to buy digital assets, not every service the machines offer. Operators may keep running kiosks that accept crypto in exchange for another digital asset or U.S. currency. Hawaii residents can still sell crypto for dollars at an eligible machine and can buy, sell, or hold digital assets through online platforms that remain legal in the state.
The law defines a digital financial asset transaction kiosk as an electronic device that accepts or dispenses U.S. currency through cash or a payment card in exchange for a digital asset. The definition excludes certain merchant rewards, assets used only inside online games, and securities registered or exempt from registration under federal or Hawaii securities law.
Lawmakers targeted the cash deposit function because scammers routinely direct victims to withdraw banknotes and push the money through a kiosk. The legislature's findings describe criminals posing as government officers, bank workers, technical support staff, or company representatives before handing victims step-by-step payment instructions. Once a victim reaches a machine, the scammer may stay on the phone, supply a wallet address or QR code, and explain how to get past operator warnings, the findings said. After the transaction clears, criminals route the digital assets through other wallets or offshore platforms, limiting the chance of recovery.
The legislature cited investigations by the attorneys general of Iowa and the District of Columbia, which found fraudulent activity accounted for a large share of transactions at some operators. Lawmakers said those investigations put the rate as high as 90%, though the figure does not represent every kiosk or transaction in the United States.
CoinATMRadar data showed Hawaii had 57 cryptocurrency ATMs and kiosks operating across four main islands as of Aug. 12. Operators must disable the deposit function or stop offering machines that accept dollars for crypto before the October deadline.
Nationally, the FBI's Internet Crime Complaint Center received 13,460 kiosk-related complaints involving $388.98 million in adjusted losses in 2025. Complaint numbers rose 23% from 2024, while reported losses climbed 58%. More than half of the 2025 complaints came from people older than 50, whose reported losses exceeded $302 million, according to the bureau. That age data supports Hawaii lawmakers' finding that scammers often target older residents with urgent payment demands and impersonation schemes.
IC3 cautioned that its state totals cover complaints in which a cryptocurrency kiosk appeared somewhere in the fraud. A case may also involve bank transfers, payment apps, or other transaction methods, meaning the full loss in a complaint cannot always be pinned to the kiosk alone. Separate figures from the FBI's 2025 annual report showed Americans submitted 826 cryptocurrency-related complaints from Hawaii with losses of about $80 million, a broader figure that covers several forms of crypto-enabled crime.
Hawaii chose a narrower transaction ban than Indiana, Tennessee, and Minnesota, where state laws prohibit kiosk operations rather than only cash-to-crypto deposits. Minnesota's statewide prohibition took effect Aug. 1 after state authorities recorded 134 complaints and nearly $1 million in losses over three years. Existing machines there had to stop processing transactions, with operators given until Dec. 31 to remove kiosks accessible to the public. Tennessee began enforcing its own prohibition July 1. Georgia took a different route the same day, keeping the machines under transaction caps, customer warnings, and refund duties for some fraud victims. Indiana's ban entered force in March. Delaware and New Jersey lawmakers have advanced proposals to prohibit crypto ATMs, though neither had become law as of August.
Other states permit the machines but require licensing, warning screens, receipts, holding periods, daily limits, or refunds in defined fraud cases. At the federal level, kiosk operators that qualify as money services businesses must register with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network and meet Bank Secrecy Act duties, including an anti-money laundering program, transaction records, suspicious activity reports, and sanctions controls. Federal registration does not stop states from imposing stricter operating rules.
Act 224 dropped a requirement for a complete shutdown when a machine can support permitted services. Operators may retain crypto-to-cash withdrawals and exchanges between digital assets, provided they do not accept U.S. currency from customers purchasing crypto after Oct. 1.
Drafted by a large language model from the source reporting linked above, then screened by automated publishing checks. It is not read by a journalist before publication. Some articles cite our Alpha Score. Verify prices and figures against the original source. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.