
German tax law does not recognise a crypto loss without a sale. Realise the loss inside one year or miss the offset. Dead coins, delistings and exchange failures all require a disposal transaction to claim the loss.
A token down 98% from its entry price feels like a tax write-off. To the German finance ministry it is nothing at all, as long as the coins stay in your wallet. No sale, no swap, no payment with the token has occurred. The price fall carries zero tax effect, regardless of how deep it goes or whether anyone is still bidding.
That gap between economic damage and tax recognition costs investors real money. The cause is no special crypto rule. It is the logic of the private disposal transaction under Section 23 of the German Income Tax Act. Anyone who understands the timing can shift thousands of euros of tax burden in a bad year. Anyone who misses it pays the full rate on later gains, even though the loss was borne economically long ago.
For crypto held privately, German income tax law knows no loss in value. It knows only a disposal transaction. What is taxable under Section 23 (1) sentence 1 no. 2 is the sale of another asset where no more than one year lies between acquisition and disposal. Without that event there is no gain to tax and no loss to claim.
A coin that fell from 4,000 euros to 40 euros reduces your tax bill by exactly zero euros while it sits in your wallet. Only the sale, the swap into another crypto asset, or paying for goods with the token turns the book loss into one you can use. The gain or loss is worked out from the disposal proceeds less the acquisition costs and related expenses, the federal finance ministry says in margin number 57 of its crypto assets circular. All three figures presuppose a transaction. Where the proceeds are missing because nothing was sold, the basis for the calculation is missing too.
The classification decides which income you may offset the loss against. The Federal Fiscal Court settled the question in its judgment of February 14, 2023, case number IX R 3/22. Virtual currencies in the form of currency tokens count among the other assets that can be the subject of a private disposal transaction, the first headnote states. The proceedings involved bitcoin, ether and monero; the lower instance was the Cologne Fiscal Court under case number 14 K 1178/20.
Crypto losses sit in a pot of their own. They are not investment income running through a bank's loss pots, and they do not reduce your salary. Gains on shares, interest or dividends in the same year cannot be offset against a crypto loss. All private disposal transactions under Section 23 fit into the offsetting. Alongside crypto assets that includes physical gold and silver, collectors' items such as watches or art, and property within the relevant periods. A loss on a sold altcoin can neutralise a gain on the sale of a gold coin, provided both events are taxable.
The one-year holding period works in both directions. Sell at a gain after more than twelve months and you pay no tax. Sell at a loss after more than twelve months and you get no recognition for it. The event is simply not taxable, and an event that is not taxable produces no deductible loss.
With losing positions you intend to unwind anyway, the moment before the anniversary of the acquisition is the one that works for tax. Sell a position bought in October in the following November and you carry the same economic damage with nothing to show for it. Where the same coin was bought several times at different moments, allocating the individual tranches is what counts. Without clean records there is no way to show which units were acquired when, and without that evidence the period cannot be proven.
The offsetting rule sits in Section 23 (3) sentence 7 and is drawn narrowly. Losses may be set off only up to the amount of the gain from private disposal transactions in the same calendar year. The general loss deduction under Section 10d is expressly ruled out. Say you realise 6,000 euros of gains from short-term crypto sales in one year and 4,500 euros of losses from unwinding two collapsed positions. Both amounts are offset in full, leaving 1,500 euros of taxable overall gain. Had you not realised the loss, the full 6,000 euros would have been charged at your personal income tax rate.
A loss with no matching gain in the same year does not evaporate. Section 23 (3) sentence 8 opens the door that sentence 7 had just closed. In accordance with Section 10d, the losses reduce the income from private disposal transactions in the immediately preceding assessment period or in the following assessment periods. The carry-back reaches exactly one year into the past: if you had taxable crypto gains last year and losses this year, the old assessment can be amended and tax refunded. The carry-forward runs into the future without a time limit and waits there for the next gain from a private disposal transaction.
A carried-forward loss has to be separately assessed. That happens only where the loss was declared in the tax return for the year of the loss. Anyone who does not file at all for a bad year, because no tax is due in any case, loses the carry-forward for every later year. That return is no formality but the only way to preserve the loss.
Under Section 23 (3) sentence 5, gains stay tax free where the overall gain from private disposal transactions in the calendar year came to less than 1,000 euros. The word "overall" is decisive: what counts is the sum of all gains and losses, not the individual sale. This is a threshold and not an allowance. At an overall gain of 999 euros everything stays tax free. At 1,000 euros the entire amount becomes taxable from the first euro.
When an exchange takes a trading pair off the market, the token remains. The holding stays in your assets unchanged, and the fall in value stays without effect. The way out is to bring the event about actively while that is still possible. Often a withdrawal to your own wallet stays open for a limited period, and often there is still a residual market elsewhere. Some venues reserve the right to convert remaining holdings into a stablecoin once a deadline has passed. Where that happens, the swap is a disposal with every consequence. Inside the one-year period a taxable gain or loss arises. Outside it the event is irrelevant. Since such clauses are regularly worded as an option rather than a commitment, you should not rely on realisation happening by itself.
When a trading platform files for insolvency, the coins are economically blocked for tax purposes but still present. No disposal has taken place. Only once it is settled to what extent you will be satisfied and what finally falls away is there any sensible way to talk about the tax treatment. Such proceedings regularly drag on for years.
The governing administrative instruction is the federal finance ministry circular on the income tax treatment of certain crypto assets, dated March 6, 2025. It runs to 34 pages, replaces the version of May 10, 2022, and adds duties of declaration, cooperation and record keeping. What the circular does not contain is a section of its own on total loss. A rule for the case where an asset perishes economically without a disposal is sought there in vain. The administration gives no assurance that a worthless holding will be recognised without a sale. The route you can plan for remains actual realisation inside the one-year period.
The circular turns unusually plain in one place. The taxpayer has to clarify the facts and obtain the necessary evidence, it states. That covers the regular and complete retrieval of the transaction overviews of central trading platforms. Missing records and data losses, for instance because of the insolvency of the trading platform or as a result of a hack, are at the expense of the taxpayer. The allocation of risk is unambiguous. When the exchange disappears and access to your trading history goes with it, you can prove neither the date of acquisition nor the acquisition costs to the tax office. Without that evidence no loss can be applied. At decentralised venues the circular adds that the heightened duty to cooperate under Section 90 (2) of the Fiscal Code generally applies.
The consequence is unspectacular and effective: transaction histories belong exported and stored locally on a regular basis, not only once a platform runs into trouble. Anyone not actively trading a holding is better off moving it into their own custody.
When a holding is worth almost nothing, three routes lead to a realisation. The one-year period applies in every case. Before unwinding, check when the units concerned were acquired and work through the tranches whose period is still running.
Private disposal transactions are declared in Schedule SO. For each event you enter the description of the asset, the acquisition and disposal dates, the disposal proceeds and the acquisition and related costs. From those entries follows the gain or loss that the tax office feeds into the threshold and the offsetting.
The most common mistake is the return not filed in the year of the loss because no tax is due. No return, no assessment. No assessment, no carry-forward. The second is the incomplete capture of swaps, which do not show up as a sale in many statements. The third concerns holdings on several platforms that are evaluated separately, even though the threshold looks at the annual total.
If it later emerges that an entry was incorrect, the route runs through a correction under Section 153 of the Fiscal Code. That is considerably more comfortable than a demand from the tax office. With crypto assets the reporting duties of the platforms now feed back data that was not available before.
(As of August 19, 2026. This article is not investment advice.)
Prepared with AlphaScala editorial tooling from the source reporting linked above. Indexable analysis may include a cited Alpha Score value. Publishing checks screen each story before release. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.