
Franklin Templeton CEO Jenny Johnson says public blockchains threaten Wall Street's fee-based revenue, not its technology. Benji fund costs $1.13 vs $1.30 per transaction.
Franklin Templeton CEO Jenny Johnson has a straightforward explanation for why major financial institutions have been slow to embrace public blockchains: the technology destroys their fee-based revenue streams.
Speaking at the Proof of Talk summit in Paris, Johnson – who oversees $1.74 trillion in assets at Franklin Templeton – told a panel audience that the resistance from traditional financial players is not about technology skepticism.
"It is about protecting the business model."
Banks and intermediaries that collect transaction fees at every step of the settlement process stand to lose that income the moment a smart contract can handle the same function at a fraction of the cost.
Johnson pointed to Franklin Templeton’s tokenized money market fund, Benji, as a concrete demonstration of the cost differential. Running 50,000 transactions through the firm’s legacy system cost $1.30 per transaction. The same volume processed on the Stellar blockchain came in at $1.13 per transaction – a meaningful reduction at institutional scale.
The $0.17 difference per trade compounds rapidly when a fund processes millions of transactions annually. For a fund with $1 billion in daily volume, the savings run into the hundreds of thousands of dollars per year. That is money that currently flows to clearing houses, custodians, and settlement agents – not to the asset manager or the end investor.
Key insight: The resistance is structural, not technical. Every dollar saved by blockchain efficiency is a dollar of fee revenue lost by an intermediary. The incumbents have no incentive to accelerate their own disruption.
Franklin Templeton’s push into digital assets is one of the most aggressive moves by a legacy asset manager in the industry’s history. The California-based firm began building its dedicated digital assets team in 2018 – years before tokenization became a mainstream focus among institutional players.
Benji launched in 2021 as the world’s first U.S.-registered mutual fund to use a public blockchain as its official system of record for processing transactions and recording share ownership. The fund invests predominantly in U.S. Treasury securities and uses blockchain strictly for operational efficiency rather than crypto exposure.
On the bitcoin front, Franklin Templeton launched the Franklin Bitcoin ETF (ticker: EZBC), a passive product that holds only bitcoin and cash, designed for investors seeking direct price exposure without managing custody.
The firm also offers a dynamic bitcoin/ethereum separately managed account product for investors wanting active allocation between the two largest digital assets.
In April 2026, Franklin Templeton announced plans to acquire 250 Digital, a spinoff from crypto venture firm CoinFund, forming a new division called Franklin Crypto to pursue active cryptocurrency investment strategies at institutional scale.
The deal itself broke new ground – BENJI tokens were used as part of the acquisition payment, making it one of the first M&A transactions structured on-chain. The firm’s digital assets division manages approximately $1.8 billion in assets.
Johnson’s argument reframes the adoption debate. The bottleneck is not scalability, regulation, or volatility. It is the entrenched fee structure of traditional finance.
When evaluating tokenization plays or blockchain infrastructure projects, look for assets that directly replace a fee-collecting intermediary. Projects targeting settlement, clearing, or custody are the ones most likely to face political resistance – and the ones with the largest addressable market if they break through.
Risk to watch: Regulatory pushback from incumbent-friendly regulators. If a jurisdiction mandates that tokenized funds must still use a traditional custodian, the cost advantage evaporates. The U.S. SEC’s stance on broker-dealer custody of digital assets remains the single biggest gatekeeper.
Franklin Templeton’s MoonPay partnership, announced alongside the Paris summit, is designed to let institutional investors move between stablecoins and the firm’s tokenized fund through an on-chain workflow. If that workflow gains traction, it will provide a live case study of fee compression in action.
Other asset managers are watching. If Franklin Templeton can demonstrate that on-chain operations reduce expense ratios without increasing operational risk, the pressure on competitors to follow suit will intensify. The first major competitor to launch a tokenized money market fund will confirm the trend. A regulatory setback for Benji would invalidate it.
For now, Johnson’s message is clear: the technology works. The business model is the problem.
Prepared with AlphaScala research tooling and grounded in primary market data: live prices, fundamentals, SEC filings, hedge-fund holdings, and insider activity. Each story is checked against AlphaScala publishing rules before release. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.