Crypto● Neutral
FATF Warns DeFi Label Masks Centralized Control, AML Gaps
FATF says DeFi platforms with identifiable controllers must follow AML rules, citing $570M in North Korean-linked hacks and 93% jurisdiction non-compliance.
Continue with
The Financial Action Task Force published a report Tuesday urging governments to apply anti-money laundering rules to decentralized finance platforms where developers, token holders or other identifiable parties retain meaningful control. The Paris-based standard-setter said many platforms that call themselves decentralized are not.
FATF divides DeFi arrangements into three categories: platforms with identifiable controllers; platforms that are effectively centralized but whose operators stay hidden; and a small group of genuinely leaderless protocols. Only the last category falls outside FATF standards, the report said.
Features commonly associated with DeFi do not make a platform decentralized for regulatory purposes, according to the report. FATF identified concentrated holdings of governance tokens, administrative privileges, control over protocol upgrades and the distribution of fees and rewards as indicators that centralized control may remain.
Other signs include upgrade keys or “kill switches,” authority to set fees or risk parameters, concentrated voting power, control of a public-facing website or app, and corporate entities that employ core developers or control a project treasury. Developers, major token holders, funders and front-end operators could therefore qualify for licensing and supervision as financial businesses. Simply operating an interface that channels users into a protocol may be sufficient, the report said.
Implementation has been sparse. Nearly 93% of jurisdictions responding to a recent FATF survey have never applied the standards to a qualifying DeFi arrangement. Only 26 of 142 jurisdictions have assessed DeFi-related risks. Only four have established licensing requirements. Only two have actually registered or licensed a platform.
The figures expose a gap between FATF’s existing framework and national enforcement. FATF standards are not themselves law, the organization said. More than 200 jurisdictions use them as a benchmark. Countries can face increased scrutiny, including placement on FATF’s “grey list,” for persistent deficiencies.