
FASB proposal defines three criteria for stablecoins as cash equivalents: demand redemption, direct claim on issuer, segregated liquid reserves. MiCA already requires this in the EU.
The US Financial Accounting Standards Board published a proposal on 18 August 2026 that lays out when a stablecoin can be carried as a cash equivalent on a corporate balance sheet. The proposal names three conditions, and a token must meet all three at once, the board said. The comment period runs until 19 November 2026.
The trigger was straightforward: companies holding stablecoins told the board they did not know how to report those holdings. The result was inconsistent practice – one company booked them as cash equivalents, another did not, and balance sheets within the same sector became incomparable, the proposal said.
The first condition requires a contractual right to convert back into money on demand. The decisive word is contractual. A marketing promise on a product page is not a claim. A claim is set out in the terms of use, in the whitepaper or in the issuance agreement, and it is enforceable, the board said.
The second condition requires a direct right of redemption against the issuer for a known amount of money. Direct means you go to the issuer of the token and you get money, not to an exchange or an authorised partner. This is where most large dollar tokens break, the proposal's language suggests. The user agreement for Circle Mint states that the service is currently open exclusively to institutions in supported jurisdictions. At Tether, the Token Terms of Sale and Service state that redemption via the website is subject to minimum amounts and further requirements, and that the redemption price per USD₮ is one unit of the reference currency, less any applicable fees.
The third condition requires the issuer to hold reserves separately, at least one to one against the circulating supply, invested in short-term, highly liquid assets. Segregated means the reserves do not sit in the general corporate assets but are held separately. One to one means full backing. Short-term and highly liquid excludes anything that cannot be turned into money within days, the board said.
For private investors, the proposal matters indirectly. Most stablecoin holders cannot redeem directly with the issuer. The exit runs through the secondary market, and under stress the price is a market opinion about redeemability, not a redemption.
The European Union already requires what the FASB is proposing. Article 49 of the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation gives holders a claim against the issuer, requires issuance at par value, requires the issuer to redeem at any time and at par value at the holder's request, and makes clear that redemption is not subject to a fee. A holder of an e-money token authorised in the EU has exactly the right that the FASB is now describing as an accounting characteristic, the regulation states.
The proposal is not final. Anyone can comment until 19 November 2026. The board then decides on the final version and the date it takes effect. Wording can still change until then. The proposal is US law for reporting entities, not consumer law. No issuer is obliged by this proposal to change anything about its product. The pressure it creates is indirect: a company that wants to report its holdings as cash will prefer tokens that meet the criteria.
The full text of the proposal and the board's announcement are on the FASB website. The wording of Article 49 of MiCA is available on EUR-Lex.
Prepared with AlphaScala editorial tooling from the source reporting linked above. Indexable analysis may include a cited Alpha Score value. Publishing checks screen each story before release. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.