
FASB's new proposal would let some stablecoins count as cash equivalents, but only if they meet strict redemption, reserve, and collateral tests. Public comments are due by November 19.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board is trying to settle a question that has dogged corporate treasurers for years: when does a stablecoin count as cash?
A proposed Accounting Standards Update published Thursday does not rewrite the definition of cash equivalents. Instead, it adds illustrative examples to help companies decide whether a given digital asset qualifies. FASB said the guidance follows years of inconsistent reporting and a flood of requests during its 2025 agenda consultation.
Under the proposal, a stablecoin or digital asset would need three things to be treated as a cash equivalent: an on-demand contractual right to redeem with the issuer for a known cash amount, fully segregated reserves held one-to-one in short-term, highly liquid assets, and no material exposure to valuation risk from the underlying collateral. FASB made clear that active secondary trading alone does not count. If the holder cannot go directly to the issuer for a known dollar amount, the token stays on the books as an intangible asset.
The language rules out most crypto-backed stablecoins and any token pegged to gold or other volatile collateral. Even a dollar-pegged stablecoin could fail the test if its reserves include assets that do not meet the short-term, high-liquidity standard.
FASB also proposed a broader disclosure rule. Any company that labels an asset as a cash equivalent would have to break out the significant components and their amounts. The board said the goal is to give investors a clearer view of what sits inside the cash line.
Companies can still choose to classify qualifying stablecoins as cash equivalents, but they must check whether applicable laws or regulations block that treatment. FASB is taking public comments until November 19, 2026, and will set an effective date after reviewing feedback.
The proposal arrives as more corporate treasurers and crypto market participants push for accounting clarity. The Dartmouth crypto ETF value falls 15% to $12.4M; shares unchanged case showed how classification differences can produce widely varying balance-sheet treatments for similar assets. A clear FASB standard could reduce that variance, though the comment period and rule-making timeline mean the answer is still months away.
Prepared with AlphaScala editorial tooling from the source reporting linked above. Indexable analysis may include a cited Alpha Score value. Publishing checks screen each story before release. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.