Sign In Get Started

Dollar Selloff Builds as Markets Wait on Fed Minutes, Brent $90

Forex▼ Bearish

Dollar Selloff Builds as Markets Wait on Fed Minutes, Brent $90

2026-08-17 13:30 UTCBy AlphaScala Research DeskSource reporting: Action ForexEditorial standards

Dollar Selloff Builds as Markets Wait on Fed Minutes, Brent $90

Dollar bears hold the edge as markets digest weaker US data. Wednesday's FOMC minutes and Brent's failure to break $90 despite the Hormuz collapse are the next tests.

Continue with

Japan PPI Keeps BOJ on Track for September Hike

What is a pip in forex trading?

Dollar started the new week under broad selling pressure, with no fresh US data shock to blame. Markets instead continued working through the cumulative implications of weaker employment, softer retail spending and cooling inflation, all of which have steadily dismantled the case for aggressive Fed tightening. September hike odds have fallen from roughly 60% earlier this month to around 25-30%, while the rate path increasingly looks like limited fine-tuning rather than the beginning of another sustained hiking cycle.

The FX leaderboard makes the shift clear. Dollar sits at the bottom, followed by Yen and Loonie, while Aussie is strongest and showing signs of acceleration. Kiwi follows, then Swiss Franc, leaving Euro and Sterling in the middle.

Dollar weakness without a fresh catalyst suggests repricing still has momentum. But the next leg is unlikely to come from repeating what markets already know. Wednesday's FOMC minutes and Brent's continuing struggle with $90 now offer two clearer tests of whether the bearish Dollar narrative can extend.

Fed minutes matter more than usual because the post-meeting press conference revealed remarkably little about internal debate. The headline vote was 9-3 for a hold, but that does not necessarily mean only three policymakers were seriously considering a hike. Minutes can show whether some members of the majority were close calls, officials who agreed to wait but shared much of the dissenters' inflation concern.

That is especially important because Neel Kashkari and Lorie Logan framed their dissents around timing rather than a radically different destination. Their argument was essentially preventive: move modestly now to reduce the risk that the Fed eventually needs to tighten much more aggressively. If minutes show versions of that "insurance hike" logic appearing among hold voters, markets may discover the Committee was more hawkish beneath the surface than the 9-3 count suggests. If the majority instead focused heavily on emerging labor-market weakness, the case for renewed near-term tightening would look considerably thinner.

Middle East inflation risk deserves particular attention. Kashkari argued that repeated supply shocks, pandemic, Ukraine, tariffs and now Middle East conflict, could eventually prevent inflation from behaving like a series of temporary disturbances. If the broader Committee discussion shows similar concern over oil and Hormuz, it would establish a clearer threshold for when geopolitics starts influencing Fed policy directly.

Still, Wednesday's minutes describe a Fed meeting that happened before softer July CPI, PPI and retail sales data. Since then, September hike odds have fallen dramatically. That makes the minutes a poor guide to what the Committee would vote today. Their value instead lies in revealing why officials chose their positions and what data could make them switch. The market-moving question is not whether three dissenters were hawkish, that is already known, but whether the minutes identify specific triggers that recent data are already moving toward or away from.

The US-Iran story presents a similar distinction between existing stress and genuinely new information. The formal 60-day truce deadline arrives this week, but the arrangement has already been largely non-functional for weeks. Oman continues talks with Tehran over reopening the Strait of Hormuz while the US keeps its blockade of Iranian ports in place, and Washington continues demanding that Iran abandon any path toward nuclear weapons.

Commercial traffic through Hormuz has collapsed. Only five cargo ships reportedly crossed on Saturday and none on Sunday, compared with 31 during the previous weekend. Yet Brent's Monday rebound has still left crude capped beneath $90. That tells markets something important: severe disruption alone is no longer enough. Much of the current standoff appears priced, and oil increasingly needs a fresh escalation, rather than merely persistence of the existing crisis, to generate another meaningful geopolitical premium.

That makes the near-term setup unusually clean. Dollar can continue weakening if FOMC minutes show narrow support for immediate tightening while Brent stays below $90. Both would reinforce the idea that the Fed faces only limited need for additional rate increases despite geopolitical uncertainty.

Risks run in the opposite direction. Minutes revealing that several hold voters sympathized with preventive tightening would make markets more sensitive to the next strong US data. A genuine escalation around Iran or Hormuz that finally pushes Brent through $90 could revive inflation expectations independently. Until one of those happens, however, Dollar bears retain the advantage: aggressive Fed tightening is being priced away, and geopolitical shock has yet to become large enough to reverse that process.