
The trade group argues the 0.2% gross-receipts tax violates state and federal law, and could set a dangerous precedent for other states.
A trade group representing crypto firms sued Illinois on Monday over its new Digital Asset Tax Act, the first state-level tax targeting crypto business activity in the U.S.
The Digital Chamber, led by CEO Cody Carbone, filed its complaint in Sangamon County circuit court. The group is asking the court to strike down the law before it takes effect on Jan. 1, 2027. Governor JB Pritzker signed the measure on June 16 as part of Illinois' roughly $56 billion fiscal year 2027 budget.
The law imposes a 0.2% tax on digital asset business activity, which includes exchanging and transferring digital assets. Storage transactions also fall under the tax. It applies to firms based in Illinois or serving Illinois customers with gross receipts of at least $100,000 a year. The state projects the tax will raise roughly $60 million annually once fully in effect.
The tax is charged on gross transaction value, not net gains. The complaint notes the law "does not distinguish between gains and losses, between profitable and unprofitable" trades. A firm could owe tax on activity that produced no profit or even a loss, simply because a transfer occurred.
Carbone framed the lawsuit as a consumer-protection fight. "Today we are asking the courts to protect consumers and our members and stop this unfair tax in Illinois," he said. The complaint also claims the taxing provision "slipped into legislation the night before the bill's final consideration," giving the industry little chance to respond.
The complaint argues the tax violates the Illinois Constitution's uniformity and due process clauses. It also says the tax burdens interstate commerce under the U.S. Constitution's Commerce Clause and conflicts with the federal Internet Tax Freedom Act, which generally bars states from taxing internet-based transactions in a discriminatory way.
The complaint states that the Illinois law "distinguishes only between traditional financial infrastructure and blockchain infrastructure," taxing digital asset activity while leaving functionally identical traditional finance transactions untouched.
When Pritzker signed the bill, a16z Crypto's Miles Jennings called it "one of the most anti-crypto laws in the U.S." The Crypto Council for Innovation and the Illinois Blockchain Association had already urged lawmakers to repeal the provision before it went into force.
No case number has been made public. Illinois officials have not issued a public response to the complaint. The state has roughly five months before the law is scheduled to take effect, giving the Sangamon County court a narrow window to rule.
Prepared with AlphaScala editorial tooling from the source reporting linked above. Indexable analysis may include a cited Alpha Score value. Publishing checks screen each story before release. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.