
Two states move to ban crypto kiosks after FBI data shows $388M in losses. Operators face 90-day removal deadlines and fines up to $20,000. More states may follow.
Two East Coast states are pushing to eliminate cryptocurrency ATMs. Delaware’s House Bill 441 cleared committee and now heads to the full chamber. New Jersey’s Senate Commerce Committee gave unanimous approval to a parallel measure. Both bills would prohibit owning, placing, or operating crypto kiosks that convert cash into digital assets.
Delaware’s bill gives existing operators 90 days after passage to remove their machines. The language also covers cash-to-crypto transactions at retail counters and point-of-sale systems, closing service-model loopholes. First violations carry a $10,000 fine in New Jersey; repeat offenses double to $20,000.
State Representative Cyndie Romer, who introduced Delaware’s bill, said experienced crypto investors rarely use ATMs that charge fees near 20%. Digital exchange platforms charge far less for comparable trades.
The legislative push follows FBI data showing $388 million in losses from crypto ATM fraud in 2025. The agency logged nearly 13,500 complaints, a 23% increase from 2024. Reported losses jumped 58% year-over-year. People over 50 accounted for more than half the complainants, with losses above $302 million.
Lawmakers say fraudsters instruct victims to deposit cash into crypto kiosks during phone scams and fake investment pitches. The transactions are fast and difficult to reverse. That makes the machines a consumer protection problem state authorities are choosing to solve with outright bans.
Industry operators dispute responsibility. They argue criminals use many payment methods, not just kiosks. Several companies have added transaction caps and fraud warnings. Bitcoin Depot, which once ran more than 9,000 kiosks globally, cited regulatory pressure as a factor in its bankruptcy.
Both states join a growing movement. Indiana enacted a statewide ban in March. Tennessee followed in April. Minnesota did the same in May. Arizona and California set transaction ceilings instead of full bans. Municipal governments have also explored local restrictions.
No floor vote has been scheduled in either Delaware or New Jersey. The pattern in Indiana, Tennessee, and Minnesota suggests outright prohibition is becoming the default response to kiosk fraud.
For traders who use crypto ATMs for convenience or privacy, the options are narrowing. Best crypto brokers offer lower fees and more security, though they require identity verification. The broader crypto market is watching how far the ban wave spreads.
Prepared with AlphaScala research tooling and grounded in primary market data: live prices, fundamentals, SEC filings, hedge-fund holdings, and insider activity. Each story is checked against AlphaScala publishing rules before release. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.