
CZ backs ASEAN crypto passporting to let firms licensed in one market enter others via fast-track, citing EU's MiCA model and existing regional fund frameworks.
Changpeng Zhao publicly endorsed a plan to let crypto firms licensed in one ASEAN country enter others through a fast-track process. He spoke at the ASEAN Tech Summit Manila 2026, during a session called "One ASEAN, One Digital Economy."
Zhao backed a proposal from Lito Villanueva of FinTech Alliance PH. The idea is simple: a firm already regulated in Singapore, for example, would notify its home regulator and submit a slimmed-down filing to expand into Vietnam or the Philippines. No full license application from scratch. No rebuilding the compliance stack at every border.
ASEAN has no such system for digital assets today. Each of the ten member states runs its own rulebook. A company trying to operate across five or six markets fights five or six separate regulatory battles. That means duplicated legal teams, fragmented timelines, and high overhead. Smaller firms, the ones that might bring genuine competition, often stay out.
Zhao argued the framework would slash compliance costs, sharpen competition, and push service quality higher. He did not pretend the politics would be easy. Technology, he said, is the easy part. Political coordination is the hard part.
ASEAN has already built similar cross-border arrangements in other financial areas. The ASEAN Capital Markets Forum's Collective Investment Schemes Framework lets funds operate across borders through a streamlined authorization process. Malaysia, Singapore, and Thailand launched it in 2014. The Philippines joined in 2021. The ACMF also runs a pass for investment advisers under its Professional Mobility Framework. Regulators in the region know how to do mutual recognition. They just have not applied it to crypto.
Zhao pointed to the European Union's Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation as a possible model. MiCA lets a crypto entity licensed in one member state offer services across the bloc. A firm licensed in France can passport into Germany, Spain, Portugal. The home regulator handles the notification. The host regulator gets a heads-up. It is not frictionless, but it beats filing fresh applications in 27 countries.
ASEAN is different – ten countries with diverging income levels, legal traditions, and attitudes toward financial risk. Getting Jakarta, Bangkok, Kuala Lumpur, Manila, and Singapore to agree on a shared baseline for crypto licensing is genuinely hard. Zhao argued the lighter application process for firms already licensed somewhere in the region is achievable, even if full harmonization is not.
Whether regulators are ready to move is unclear. The proposal remains a discussion, not a policy. Regional stakeholders are talking, but no unified framework has been set up.
Villanueva's proposal, which Zhao backs, does not ask ASEAN to tear up existing structures. It asks regulators to recognize each other's work. A firm that has already passed scrutiny in one market probably does not need to prove the same things again somewhere else.
The technical infrastructure for cross-border crypto services is largely already there, Zhao said. The gap is political. Getting ten governments to trust each other's licensing standards enough to accept a streamlined process – that is the real project. And it is probably a long one.
No timeline has been announced. No working group has been named publicly. The conversation is live, but the policy is not.
Drafted by a large language model from the source reporting linked above, then screened by automated publishing checks. It is not read by a journalist before publication. Some articles cite our Alpha Score. Verify prices and figures against the original source. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.