
Four EU crypto providers closed in seven weeks. The first deadline cuts off wallet transfers, forcing a taxable sale. Know the sequence before it hits.
Four crypto providers closed or sharply cut their European business inside seven weeks. Binance restructured its EU operations on July 1. BitMart announced it would cease operations at the end of July. Luno said it would close accounts in several EU regions in early August, and Revolut said it would remove USDT from its European offering by the end of August.
Each provider had a different stated reason. The pattern is the same. The first deadline in any shutdown cuts off the ability to move coins to an external wallet. After that, the only way out is a sale. That sale may be forced by the provider, and it carries tax consequences.
The background is MiCA, the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation. Since the transitional arrangements expired, every provider offering crypto services in the EU needs a Crypto-Asset Service Provider authorisation. Obtaining one means formal approval and ongoing supervision. Of the 329 MiCA authorisations counted on August 6, 2026, only 21 went to trading platforms, according to crypto market analysis. Further exits are more likely than a return to the old line-up.
Luno's case is documented. Transfers to external wallets ended at the end of June 2026, while selling and euro payouts remained possible until August 31, 2026. That gave roughly two months between the first and last deadlines. Anyone who missed the first deadline could still get to their money, but only in euros. That distinction is the most important point in this article.
The transfer cutoff comes first because external transfers require the most operational overhead: blockchain connections, anti-money-laundering checks, and a team for misaddressed transactions. Once that window closes, you no longer have a choice between holding and selling. A custody problem turns into a taxable event at a moment you do not control.
For German residents with unlimited tax liability, gains from selling crypto-assets fall under private disposal transactions in Section 23 of the Income Tax Act. The law makes no exception for involuntary disposals. Swapping one stablecoin for another counts as a disposal. A forced conversion by the provider is treated the same way.
The holding period is one year. If a position is eleven months old and the forced sale hits in the twelfth month, the tax exemption that would have arrived four weeks later disappears. Staggered purchases make this the normal case. Moving the coins to your own wallet before the cutoff lets the holding period continue untouched, because a transfer between your own addresses is not a disposal.
The step most often overlooked is pulling the transaction history. Once the account is closed, you cannot access it for tax filings. Before the cutoff, export a full CSV of all transactions, a PDF of the account statement covering the entire period, and a screenshot of the current portfolio with the date and time visible.
After the deadline, some providers charge monthly fees for remaining balances. Luno announced rising fees over time. That mainly hits old secondary accounts and small amounts people assume are not worth the effort to withdraw.
If the cutoff has passed, the money is usually not lost, but the route becomes awkward. At Luno, access after that point runs through customer service, which asks for a bank statement no older than three months. Self-service turns into an identification procedure. Get in touch in writing using the official address from the provider's help centre, not a link from an email. Record the date and content of every message, and explicitly request the transaction history. Also check which supervisory authority is responsible, because with an authorised company there is a complaints route beyond customer service.
Around every announced closure, scam messages appear claiming to help rescue the balance. They lead to fake login pages. No reputable provider asks for credentials or seed phrases by email.
Signals that an exit is coming include withdrawal processing times that stretch from hours to days, customer support that stops answering within a reasonable period, and vague communications about restructuring or regulatory reviews. No single signal proves anything. Several together justify a second look at the choice of provider.
As long as coins sit with a provider, access depends on that provider's business decisions and its authorisation. Holdings in self-custody remove that risk. The trade-off is sole responsibility for the backup. Lose the seed phrase and there is no hotline. Store it digitally without protection and you have swapped a provider risk for a theft risk. For larger amounts, a device with separate key storage is the usual route. For everyday use, many people find a software wallet on their phone sufficient.
(As of August 11, 2026. This article is not investment advice. Prices and fee structures change; check the terms with the provider before you buy.)
Transparency note: This article was produced with the assistance of artificial intelligence and reviewed by our editorial team before publication. All figures and claims were checked against the primary sources linked in the text.
Drafted by a large language model from the source reporting linked above, then screened by automated publishing checks. It is not read by a journalist before publication. Some articles cite our Alpha Score. Verify prices and figures against the original source. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.