
TRM Labs traced $2.7B between CoinEx and sanctioned Nobitex, plus $67M from Iran's central bank. OFAC sanctions hit four exchanges. Compliance teams face exposure mapping.
CoinEx processed more than $3.84 billion in transactions tied to sanctioned Iranian entities over roughly seven years, according to a TRM Labs investigation. The report lands just after the U.S. Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control hit four Iranian crypto exchanges with fresh sanctions.
The TRM report zeroes in on Nobitex and BitPin as two of the most significant counterparties. Together, the sanctioned exchanges made up a meaningful slice of Iran's estimated $10 billion in crypto activity in 2025. That figure suggests that despite years of enforcement pressure, Iran's crypto volumes have held up. CoinEx, launched in 2017 under founder Haipo Yang, has processed more than $79 billion in total trading volume since then. It is a large platform, which makes the Iranian exposure numbers harder to dismiss.
Since 2018, CoinEx and Nobitex traded more than $2.7 billion between them. That works out to roughly $1 million a day on average, a steady sustained flow that is hard to write off as coincidental. The direction of the money matters: Nobitex sent $360 million more to CoinEx than it received back. That gap means substantial sums moved out of Iran and into CoinEx's system, not the other way around.
TRM traced connections between CoinEx and more than 60 Iranian crypto businesses, including Wallex and Ramzinex. Sixty-plus businesses. That is not a handful of rogue transactions. It is a web. The pattern reads less like isolated market activity and more like a coordinated network of fund movement.
The most alarming detail in the report involves the Central Bank of Iran. TRM found that around $67 million from the Central Bank of Iran reached CoinEx through a layered laundering network between June 2025 and June 2026. The mechanics were deliberately complex: cross-chain bridges, multiple blockchains, specific smart contract structures, all designed to obscure where the money started.
ViaBTC, the mining pool linked to CoinEx, is not off the hook either. TRM traced $154 million in transactions between ViaBTC and wallets connected to Iranian entities. Funds moved frequently from mining operations toward Iran. After a cyberattack hit Nobitex in 2025, previously dormant mining wallets woke up and sent $2.7 million to a fresh Nobitex wallet. ViaBTC's fingerprints were on those transfers.
The geopolitical context matters. When the U.S.-Iran-Israel conflict intensified in 2026, transaction behavior shifted. Transfer sizes grew. Larger individual transactions became more common. That pattern, where amounts increase under pressure rather than disappear, suggests whoever was using the network adapted rather than stopped.
After OFAC's sanctions landed, overall transaction volumes between CoinEx and Iranian entities did drop. Yet TRM flagged that private accounts could still be running activity that does not show up cleanly on public blockchains. The drop in visible volume probably does not tell the whole story.
CoinEx's exposure goes beyond Iran. TRM's report tied the exchange's blockchain activity to wallets connected to the IRGC, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and Hezbollah, three entities under heavy international sanctions. The platform also came up in connection with the CoinEx hack itself, BlackSuit ransomware, and the Wasabi mixing service. Each of those links adds another layer of complication.
CoinEx pushed back. The exchange denied any direct relationship with the Iranian government or sanctioned groups and said that blockchain transactions on their own do not prove illegal conduct. That is technically true as a legal argument. Blockchain data shows movement, not intent. Yet TRM's report is not pointing at one or two transactions. It is pointing at seven years, more than 60 counterparties, and $3.84 billion.
The OFAC sanctions on Nobitex and BitPin are recent. Compliance teams at major exchanges are scrambling to map their own exposure. With private accounts potentially keeping some flows alive off the public ledger, regulators are well aware that sanctions alone do not fully seal the pipes.
Prepared with AlphaScala research tooling and grounded in primary market data: live prices, fundamentals, SEC filings, hedge-fund holdings, and insider activity. Each story is checked against AlphaScala publishing rules before release. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.