
The Major Cities Chiefs Association endorsed the bill. Polymarket odds sit at 30%. Stablecoin rules and an ethics clause for lawmakers remain unresolved before the recess.
The Major Cities Chiefs Association endorsed the latest CLARITY Act draft. Polymarket traders put the odds of President Donald Trump signing it in 2026 at 30%. The Senate has until its scheduled Aug. 7 recess to agree on stablecoin rules and DeFi liability. A political ethics clause for lawmakers remains unresolved. The CLARITY Act has faced multiple delays, with odds previously sinking to 27% after the Senate delayed a markup.
MCCA sent a letter to Senate Banking Committee Chair Tim Scott and ranking member Elizabeth Warren. The group said recent revisions addressed concerns raised by police and prosecutors. It pointed to new law-enforcement provisions in Sections 10203 through 10309.
'The inclusion of these provisions represents a meaningful step toward improving the ability of law enforcement to investigate financial crimes involving digital assets,' the association wrote.
Several other police organizations have joined the MCCA in moving toward supporting the bill. The National Organization of Black Law Enforcement Executives was the first major police association to endorse it. The Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association later offered conditional support. It requested stronger rules for DeFi accountability. The National Fraternal Order of Police, which represents more than 382,000 officers, reversed its previous opposition after reviewing revisions to the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act provisions. Major County Sheriffs of America stopped short of endorsing the legislation. The group withdrew its formal opposition and adopted a neutral position. It asked Congress to give state and local agencies a role in Treasury studies and advisory panels.
Earlier law-enforcement resistance focused on the CLARITY Act's treatment of non-custodial crypto developers. The Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act language generally protects developers and infrastructure providers from being classified as money transmitters when they do not control customer funds. Supporters say those protections prevent programmers from being prosecuted solely because criminals use open-source software.
Police groups and prosecutors argued the earlier wording was too broad. They warned that DeFi operators and mixers could use the exemption to avoid registration and accountability. The exemption would make it harder to trace illicit funds or recover assets for victims, they said. Revisions clarified that developers can still face prosecution when they knowingly or intentionally facilitate money laundering and other crimes. The updated draft also preserves existing criminal-enforcement powers and gives state and local agencies a larger role.
Democrats led by Senator Catherine Cortez Masto and several prosecutors continue to seek additional changes. Their proposal would narrow or remove protections that could shield some crypto service providers from prosecution.
The banking industry supports the broader goal of establishing federal rules for digital assets. Lawmakers need to revise the bill's stablecoin provisions, a coalition of 134 banking association officials and senior bank executives said. The coalition asked the Senate to strengthen Section 10404. Section 10404 restricts stablecoin issuers from paying interest. It allows certain rewards tied to payments and memberships.
Banks argue that exchanges could use those exceptions to provide returns resembling interest on stablecoin balances. Such products could pull deposits away from regulated banks. They could reduce funding available for mortgages and small-business loans, the coalition said. The American Bankers Association and five other financial trade groups have called the legislation an important step toward federal crypto regulation. The groups asked Congress to prohibit passive returns tied to the size or duration of stablecoin holdings. Legitimate transaction-based rewards should remain allowed, they said.
White House crypto adviser Patrick Witt disputed the banking industry's warnings. Banks are seeking protection from competition rather than stronger consumer safeguards, he argued.
Political ethics remains one of the largest barriers to a Senate agreement. Democrats want restrictions addressing financial interests in crypto held by elected officials and their families. Republican Senator Thom Tillis said he will not support the bill without an acceptable ethics provision. Tillis reportedly plans to send a bipartisan ethics proposal to the White House for Trump's approval. Democrats have not ruled out a vote before the recess. They are unlikely to back the current text without further changes.
Without a bipartisan compromise, the bill may struggle to secure the 60 Senate votes needed to overcome a filibuster.
Prepared with AlphaScala editorial tooling from the source reporting linked above. Indexable analysis may include a cited Alpha Score value. Publishing checks screen each story before release. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.