
TD Cowen gives the CLARITY Act a 75% chance of stalling before the September 15 Senate floor vote, citing political gridlock, stablecoin disputes, and procedural hurdles.
TD Cowen put a number on it: 75%. That is the firm's assessed probability that the CLARITY Act will not become law this fall. The bill has crawled through Congress for over a year and still cannot find solid ground in the Senate.
The legislation tries to draw a clean line between SEC and CFTC jurisdiction over digital assets. Digital commodities would fall to the CFTC. Investment contracts stay with the SEC. Simple enough in theory. In practice that split has triggered months of back-and-forth between the two agencies, their congressional allies, and an industry that cannot agree on what it wants either.
The Senate Banking Committee voted 15-9 to advance the bill. But a committee vote and a floor vote are different animals. Right now the floor looks like a minefield.
Democrats are not playing along quietly. They want changes to the ethics provisions and the Bank Secrecy Act sections of the bill. If Republicans block votes on those amendments, Democrats can refuse to let debate close. The whole thing grinds to a halt. Senator Cynthia Lummis has released updates to the Act, but those have not bridged the gap yet.
There is a messier political problem too. Some Republican senators may want to sidestep a confrontation over President Donald Trump's crypto holdings and the opposition from law enforcement groups. Majority Leader John Thune has filed cloture, the procedural move to force a vote. Filing cloture does not guarantee anything actually happens. A September 15 agreement would reduce that risk, but it is not locked in.
Then there are stablecoins. The question of whether digital asset providers can offer a return on stablecoins has split senators and the banking industry sharply. That one dispute alone could tank negotiations that might otherwise have a shot.
The outcome the industry fears most has a name: the walking dead state. The bill gets an initial procedural win, clears the first cloture motion, and then stops. No amendment votes. No further debate. No additional motions. The bill technically lives but goes nowhere while regulators keep building parallel rules on their own timeline.
That is not a hypothetical. It has happened before with complex financial legislation, and the CLARITY Act has enough unresolved pieces – registration rules, disclosure requirements, how exchanges and custodians fit – to make stalling very easy, analysts said.
Prediction markets are not optimistic either. As of August 9, traders on Polymarket put the probability of the CLARITY Act becoming law by 2026 at around 21%. TD Cowen's own 25% chance of passage lines up closely with that read.
TD Cowen does lay out scenarios where the bill actually passes. One: Democrats get a vote on their ethics amendment, it fails, but enough of them decide to support the bill anyway and it moves forward with bipartisan backing. That path requires goodwill that has been hard to find lately. Another scenario involves a direct deal between President Trump and Democratic senators – something that secures enough votes to end debate. TD Cowen flagged that as less likely.
The fall session kicks off September 14. Republicans need bipartisan support to clear even the first procedural hurdle. They do not have it locked up. The math is tight, the politics are messy, and the window is short.
September 15 is the date everyone is watching. If the vote does not happen, or happens and stalls, the CLARITY Act joins a long list of crypto bills that got close and went nowhere. TD Cowen gives that outcome a 75% chance.
Drafted by a large language model from the source reporting linked above, then screened by automated publishing checks. It is not read by a journalist before publication. Some articles cite our Alpha Score. Verify prices and figures against the original source. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.