
Senate votes Sept. 15 on CLARITY Act; Bitwise CIO says bill in limbo. SEC advances parallel rules on custody, tokenization, and fundraising. Atkins calls it a 'regulatory bridge'.
The Senate will hold a procedural vote on the CLARITY Act on Sept. 15 after missing its August window. Bitwise Chief Investment Officer Matt Hougan told clients the delay puts the bill in a “walking dead” state – alive politically but unable to reach final passage. U.S. Senator Jim Risch (R-ID) issued a statement Aug. 8 that the Senate would start the process of passing the legislation on that date. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) filed cloture on the motion to proceed hours earlier, fixing the vote for 2:15 p.m. EDT. The question before senators is whether to take up the bill, not whether to pass it.
Risch’s statement framed the September effort around consumer protection and U.S. competitiveness. “On September 15th, the U.S. Senate will start the process of passing the CLARITY Act,” Risch said. “The stakes couldn’t be higher.” He added that failure to pass the bill would leave Americans vulnerable to scams and fraud while ceding jobs and investment to overseas competitors.
Clearing the procedural hurdle requires 60 votes, meaning at least seven Democrats must join the 53-seat Republican majority. Talks remain open on ethics requirements, illicit-finance provisions, and reconciling Senate Agriculture Committee language. The new timetable keeps the legislation alive while extending uncertainty over when Congress can establish a permanent federal framework for digital asset markets.
Hougan had outlined this scenario in a memo before the August window closed. “The bill will enter a ‘walking dead’ state,” he wrote. “Nothing can actually kill it, but it will lurch along.” His characterization matches the current legislative limbo: no final resolution, but no death either.
The prolonged uncertainty increases the near-term significance of U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Chair Paul Atkins’ rulemaking agenda. Atkins has indicated that regulators can address many of the same issues Congress is tackling if lawmakers do not finish the bill. He outlined an interim approach in February, telling the Senate Banking Committee that the SEC and Commodity Futures Trading Commission intended to provide a “regulatory bridge” while Congress works on market structure legislation.
Their joint Project Crypto initiative includes work on token classifications and potential exemptions that could permit certain onchain transactions under clearer federal requirements. In March, the two agencies issued a joint guidance stating that most crypto assets are not themselves securities. Atkins called that a bridge for entrepreneurs and investors while Congress advances market structure legislation.
The SEC’s July regulatory agenda moves that bridge into specific policy areas. The commission is developing rules for how crypto assets can be issued, held, and traded onchain under federal securities laws. Topics include crypto fundraising, custody, and tokenized securities. Agency action can clarify how securities laws apply, establish exemptions, and create rules for securities-related onchain activity without waiting for Congress.
Atkins has described congressional legislation as the stronger way to future-proof U.S. crypto regulation, distinguishing interim agency rules from a statutory market structure framework. The CLARITY Act would establish a broader division of responsibilities between the SEC and CFTC, including federal oversight of digital commodities, registration, trading, customer assets, and market infrastructure. Those jurisdictional boundaries require congressional action, not just SEC rulemaking within its existing authority.
Hougan argued that crypto development can proceed despite legislative delays, even if regulatory certainty remains unresolved. “Crypto will be fine,” he said. “Even if CLARITY doesn’t pass, the crypto industry will find a way forward.” U.S. Senator Cynthia Lummis (R-WY) is pressing for comprehensive federal market structure legislation that would establish clearer statutory rules for businesses, investors, and regulators.
The next congressional test arrives Sept. 15, when senators decide whether to take up H.R. 3633. The bill cleared the House 294-134 and advanced from the Senate Banking Committee 15-9. The vote will determine whether the bill advances toward a statutory framework, while the SEC continues developing crypto rules under its existing authority.
Drafted by a large language model from the source reporting linked above, then screened by automated publishing checks. It is not read by a journalist before publication. Some articles cite our Alpha Score. Verify prices and figures against the original source. Educational coverage, not personalized advice.